Optimization of automation: II. Estimation method of ostracism rate based on the loss of situation awareness of human operators in nuclear power plants

Abstract With the introduction of automation in various industries including the nuclear field, its side effect, referred to as the Out-of-the-Loop (OOTL) problem, has emerged as a critical issue that needs to be addressed. Many studies have been attempted to analyze and solve the OOTL problem, but this issue still needs a clear solution to provide criteria for introducing automation. Therefore, a quantitative estimation method for identifying negative effects of automation is proposed in this paper. The representative aspect of the OOTL problem in nuclear power plants (NPPs) is that human operators in automated operations are given less information than human operators in manual operations. In other words, human operators have less opportunity to obtain needed information as automation is introduced. From this point of view, the degree of difficulty in obtaining information from automated systems is defined as the Level of Ostracism (LOO). Using the LOO and information theory, we propose the ostracism rate, which is a new estimation method that expresses how much automation interrupts human operators’ situation awareness. We applied production rules to describe the human operators’ thinking processes, Bayesian inference to describe the production rules mathematically, and information theory to calculate the amount of information that human operators receive through observations. The validity of the suggested method was proven by conducting an experiment. The results show that the ostracism rate was significantly related to the accuracy of human operators’ situation awareness, and that the calculation of the amount of information that human operators receive is useful as a measure of the ostracism rate.

[1]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Out‐of‐the‐loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety , 1997 .

[2]  Toshiyuki Inagaki,et al.  Adaptive Automation: Sharing and Trading of Control , 2001 .

[3]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[4]  William S. Helton,et al.  Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  I. Singh,et al.  Effects of Target Expectancy and Cognitive Demand on Vigilance Performance , 2007 .

[6]  Stephen Fleger,et al.  Human-system Interfaces for Automatic Systems , 2010 .

[7]  Sharon M McFadden,et al.  Factors affecting performance on a target monitoring task employing an automatic tracker , 2004, Ergonomics.

[8]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[9]  R. Parasuraman Vigilance, monitoring, and search. , 1986 .

[10]  James L. Szalma,et al.  Performance Under Stress , 2017 .

[11]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Failure Detection in Dynamic Systems , 1981 .

[13]  David N. Hogg,et al.  Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plant control rooms , 1995 .

[14]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[15]  Marion P. Kibbe Information Transfer from Intelligent EW Displays , 1988 .

[16]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Aviation Automation: The Search for A Human-centered Approach , 1996 .

[17]  Stephen Fleger,et al.  Guidance for Human-System Interfaces to Automatic Systems , 2010 .

[18]  J. P. Frankmann,et al.  Theories of vigilance. , 1962 .

[19]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[20]  Poong-Hyun Seong,et al.  An analytic model for situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators based on Bayesian inference , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Winston Bennett,et al.  Factors That Influence Skill Decay and Retention: A Quantitative Review and Analysis , 1998 .

[22]  John D. Lee,et al.  Human Factors and Ergonomics in Automation Design , 2006 .

[23]  Arye R. Ephrath,et al.  Monitoring vs. Man-in-the-Loop Detection of Aircraft Control Failures , 1981 .

[24]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task , 2004 .

[25]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .

[26]  Poong Hyun Seong,et al.  Optimization of automation: I. Estimation method of cognitive automation rates reflecting the effects of automation on human operators in nuclear power plants , 2014 .

[27]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[28]  Hiroshi Furukawa,et al.  Operator's situation awareness under different levels of automation; evaluations through probabilistic human cognitive simulations , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[29]  W. Helton,et al.  Working memory load and the vigilance decrement , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.