Number line compression and the illusory perception of random numbers.

Developmental studies indicate that children initially possess a compressed intuition of numerical distances, in which larger numbers are less discriminable than small ones. Education then "linearizes" this responding until by about age eight, children become able to map symbolic numerals onto a linear spatial scale. However, this illusion of compression of symbolic numerals may still exist in a dormant form in human adults and may be observed in appropriate experimental contexts. To investigate this issue, we asked adult participants to rate whether a random sequence of numbers contained too many small numbers or too many large ones. Participants exhibited a large bias, judging as random a geometric series that actually oversampled small numbers, consistent with a compression of large numbers. This illusion resisted training on a number-space mapping task, even though performance was linear on this task. While the illusion was moderately reduced by explicit exposure to linear sequences, responding was still significantly compressed. Thus, the illusion of compression is robust in this task, but linear and compressed responding can be exhibited in the same participants depending on the experimental context.

[1]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[2]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[4]  E. Miller,et al.  Coding of Cognitive Magnitude Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[5]  R. Shepard,et al.  The internal representation of numbers , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Paul B. Buckley,et al.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  P. G. Vos,et al.  Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[8]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[9]  L. E. Krueger Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  S. Dehaene Subtracting Pigeons: Logarithmic or Linear? , 2001, Psychological science.

[11]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[12]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Representational change and children’s numerical estimation , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[15]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[17]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Calibrating the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[19]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[20]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990 .

[21]  S. Dehaene Symbols and quantities in parietal cortex: elements of a mathematical theory of number representation and manipulation , 2007 .

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  A common representational system governed by Weber's law: nonverbal numerical similarity judgments in 6-year-olds and rhesus macaques. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[24]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cognitive euroscience: Scalar variability in price estimation and the cognitive consequences of switching to the euro , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[25]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[26]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Multiple spatial representations of number: evidence for co-existing compressive and linear scales , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  William P. Banks,et al.  The apparent magnitude of number scaled by random production , 1974 .

[28]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures , 2008, Science.

[29]  R. Siegler,et al.  The Development of Numerical Estimation , 2003, Psychological science.

[30]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[31]  W P Banks,et al.  Two subjective scales of number , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: abstract or not abstract? , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[33]  J NACHMIAS,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF THE METHOD OF LIMITS AND THE DOUBLE STAIRCASE-METHOD. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.