Number line compression and the illusory perception of random numbers.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Stanislas Dehaene | Arnaud Viarouge | Jérôme Sackur | Edward M Hubbard | S. Dehaene | J. Sackur | E. Hubbard | Arnaud Viarouge
[1] Paul Boersma,et al. Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .
[2] T. Cornsweet,et al. The staircrase-method in psychophysics. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.
[3] R. C. Oldfield. THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .
[4] E. Miller,et al. Coding of Cognitive Magnitude Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.
[5] R. Shepard,et al. The internal representation of numbers , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.
[6] Paul B. Buckley,et al. Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.
[7] P. G. Vos,et al. Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups , 1982, Memory & cognition.
[8] E. Spelke,et al. Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.
[9] L. E. Krueger. Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[10] S. Dehaene. Subtracting Pigeons: Logarithmic or Linear? , 2001, Psychological science.
[11] C. Gallistel,et al. Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.
[12] Robert S. Siegler,et al. Representational change and children’s numerical estimation , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.
[13] Rochel Gelman,et al. Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[14] Paul Boersma,et al. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .
[15] R. C. Oldfield. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[16] S. Dehaene,et al. Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.
[17] Martin H. Fischer,et al. Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic , 2008, Cognition.
[18] Stanislas Dehaene,et al. Calibrating the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.
[19] C. Gallistel,et al. Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .
[20] Emmanuel Dupoux,et al. Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990 .
[21] S. Dehaene. Symbols and quantities in parietal cortex: elements of a mathematical theory of number representation and manipulation , 2007 .
[22] S. Dehaene,et al. Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] Elizabeth M Brannon,et al. A common representational system governed by Weber's law: nonverbal numerical similarity judgments in 6-year-olds and rhesus macaques. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[24] Stanislas Dehaene,et al. Cognitive euroscience: Scalar variability in price estimation and the cognitive consequences of switching to the euro , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[25] S. Dehaene. Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.
[26] Stella F. Lourenco,et al. Multiple spatial representations of number: evidence for co-existing compressive and linear scales , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.
[27] William P. Banks,et al. The apparent magnitude of number scaled by random production , 1974 .
[28] Pierre Pica,et al. Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures , 2008, Science.
[29] R. Siegler,et al. The Development of Numerical Estimation , 2003, Psychological science.
[30] ROBERT S. MOYER,et al. Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.
[31] W P Banks,et al. Two subjective scales of number , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.
[32] R. Cohen Kadosh,et al. Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: abstract or not abstract? , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[33] J NACHMIAS,et al. AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF THE METHOD OF LIMITS AND THE DOUBLE STAIRCASE-METHOD. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.