Multicenter cell processing for cardiovascular regenerative medicine applications: the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) experience.

Abstract Background aims. Multicenter cellular therapy clinical trials require the establishment and implementation of standardized cell-processing protocols and associated quality control (QC) mechanisms. The aims here were to develop such an infrastructure in support of the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) and to report on the results of processing for the first 60 patients. Methods. Standardized cell preparations, consisting of autologous bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells, prepared using a Sepax device, were manufactured at each of the five processing facilities that supported the clinical treatment centers. Processing staff underwent centralized training that included proficiency evaluation. Quality was subsequently monitored by a central QC program that included product evaluation by the CCTRN biorepositories. Results. Data from the first 60 procedures demonstrated that uniform products, that met all release criteria, could be manufactured at all five sites within 7 h of receipt of BM. Uniformity was facilitated by use of automated systems (the Sepax for processing and the Endosafe device for endotoxin testing), standardized procedures and centralized QC. Conclusions. Complex multicenter cell therapy and regenerative medicine protocols can, where necessary, successfully utilize local processing facilities once an effective infrastructure is in place to provide training and QC.

[1]  T. Henry,et al.  Development of a Network to Test Strategies in Cardiovascular Cell Delivery: The NHLBI-sponsored Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular translational research.

[2]  H. Arnesen,et al.  Long-term results after intracoronary injection of autologous mononuclear bone marrow cells in acute myocardial infarction: the ASTAMI randomised, controlled study , 2009, Heart.

[3]  D. Sutherland,et al.  Comparison of two single-platform ISHAGE-based CD34 enumeration protocols on BD FACSCalibur and FACSCanto flow cytometers. , 2009, Cytotherapy.

[4]  Doris A Taylor,et al.  Rationale and design for TIME: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial evaluating the safety and effect of timing of administration of bone marrow mononuclear cells after acute myocardial infarction. , 2009, American heart journal.

[5]  B. Strauer,et al.  The BALANCE Study: clinical benefit and long-term outcome after intracoronary autologous bone marrow cell transplantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  R. Lindblad,et al.  A multicenter comparison study between the Endosafe PTS rapid-release testing system and traditional methods for detecting endotoxin in cell-therapy products. , 2008, Cytotherapy.

[7]  P. Wernet,et al.  Separation of adult bone marrow mononuclear cells using the automated closed separation system Sepax. , 2008, Cytotherapy.

[8]  E. Shpall,et al.  Evaluation of an Automated Ficoll Procedure To Enrich for Mononuclear Cells for Use in Clinical Trials. , 2007 .

[9]  J. Brinchmann,et al.  The REPAIR-AMI and ASTAMI trials: cell isolation procedures. , 2007, European heart journal.

[10]  M. Al-mallah,et al.  Adult bone marrow-derived cells for cardiac repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  A. Zeiher,et al.  Cell isolation procedures matter: a comparison of different isolation protocols of bone marrow mononuclear cells used for cell therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, European heart journal.

[12]  A. Ganser,et al.  Intracoronary Bone Marrow Cell Transfer After Myocardial Infarction: Eighteen Months’ Follow-Up Data From the Randomized, Controlled BOOST (BOne marrOw transfer to enhance ST-elevation infarct regeneration) Trial , 2006, Circulation.

[13]  S. Dymarkowski,et al.  Autologous bone marrow-derived stem-cell transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: double-blind, randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.