Board Governance Attributes and Organizational Characteristics of Mosque Co-Operatives in Malaysia

Performances of mosque co-operatives rely on the effectiveness of the board of governance. The board has responsibilities to determine the strategic direction of mosque co-operatives, oversight management, and ensure the integrity of members’ rights and interests. The board of governance functions is becoming more challenging since the launching of National Co-operative Policy II (2011-2020), which among another, place greater emphasis on the expansion of mosque co-operatives movement via initiative of 1 Community, 1 Cooperative. Furthermore, the board of governance of mosque co-operatives is expected to deliver not only economic performance but also socio-economic governance, especially in supporting the activism of mosque institutions. Hence, as an initial observation, this study attempts to highlight the board governance attributes and mosque co-operatives organisational characteristics. The initial findings are essential in assisting regulator and policy maker like Ministry of Domestic Trade, Co-operative, and Consumerism (KPDNKK), Malaysia Co-operative Societies Commission (SKM), and Malaysia National Co-operative Movement (ANGKASA) in preparing the Mosque Co-operative Strategic Plan 2017-2020, and National Co-operative Policy III (2021-2030).

[1]  Ching Choo Huang,et al.  Influence of Cooperative Members' Participation and Gender on Performance , 2015 .

[2]  A. Zaridis,et al.  Entrepreneurship and SME's Organizational Structure. Elements of a Successful Business , 2014 .

[3]  I. W. Othman,et al.  Accountability Issues and Challenges: The Scenario for Malaysian Cooperative Movement , 2013 .

[4]  Y. M. ‘Aini,et al.  Factors Affecting Cooperatives’ Performance in Relation to Strategic Planning and Members’ Participation☆ , 2012 .

[5]  T. Awokuse,et al.  Determinants of Producers' Participation in Agricultural Cooperatives: Evidence from Northern China , 2012 .

[6]  Ioanna Boulouta Hidden Connections: The Link Between Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Social Performance , 2012, Journal of Business Ethics.

[7]  A. Eagly The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[8]  G. Ortmann,et al.  Institutional and governance factors influencing the performance of selected smallholder agricultural cooperatives in KwaZulu-Natal , 2009 .

[9]  J. Bond Cooperative Financial Performance and Board of Director Characteristics: A Quantitative Investigation , 2009 .

[10]  A. Carr,et al.  A Study of the Organizational Characteristics of Successful Cooperatives , 2008 .

[11]  M. Ramezani,et al.  Investigating the Success Factors of Poultry Growers' Cooperatives in Iran's Western Provinces , 2008 .

[12]  C. Bart,et al.  The governance role of the board in corporate strategy: a comparison of board practices in 'for profit' and 'not for profit' organisations , 2006 .

[13]  D. Mckillop,et al.  An Investigation into the Link between UK Credit Union Characteristics, Location and Their Success , 2005 .

[14]  M. Roxas,et al.  The Importance of gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision-making , 2004 .

[15]  H. Ooghe,et al.  Corporate Performance and Board Structure in Belgian Companies , 2001 .

[16]  D. Trechter Impact of diversification on agricultural cooperatives in Wisconsin , 1996 .

[17]  Lenahan O'Connell,et al.  Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior , 1989 .