Adaptive Entry Strategies Under Dominant Standards - Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry

During the '60s and the '70s, basically all software was Open Source and everyone was allowed to copy, modify and redistribute computer programs. When software ceased to be hardware-specific and the diffusion of computers took off, firms started to produce software independently from hardware and to protect their code through intellectual property rights. At present, a turnaround is taking place: the Open Source production mode is spreading across the software industry and, in some cases, it performs even better than the traditional proprietary one. Although a growing body of literature is analyzing Open Source software (OSS) issues, there is still lack of empirical data on the phenomenon, and little is known about firms that enter the software industry by producing under the Open Source license scheme (Open Source firms). This paper is a contribution to fill this gap and focuses on the business models of these firms. We find significant heterogeneity among them, in particular many agents supply both proprietary and Open Source software. We present a model of adoption that studies the intra-firm diffusion of the new paradigm. Explanatory hypotheses are discussed analyzing how the characteristics of the Open Source production mode and of network externalities in software demand shape the strategies of firms that entered the OSS field.

[1]  Bronwyn H. Hall,et al.  On Copyright and Patent Protection for Software and Databases: A Tale of Two Worlds , 2003 .

[2]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[3]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[4]  Frank Hecker,et al.  Setting Up Shop: The Business of Open-Source Software , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[5]  P. Sopp Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[6]  Richard Hawkins,et al.  The economics of open source software for a competitive firm , 2004 .

[7]  Richard M. Stallman,et al.  The GNU manifesto , 1990 .

[8]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary , 2001 .

[9]  Mikko Mustonen,et al.  Copyleft - the economics of Linux and other open source software , 2003, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[10]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[11]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Open Source Movement: Key Research Questions , 2001 .

[12]  N. Economides The Economics of Networks , 1995 .

[13]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding open source software development , 2002 .

[14]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[15]  Gregorio Robles,et al.  Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study - FLOSS FINAL REPORT , 2002 .

[16]  Joseph Farrell and Garth Saloner. Competition, Compatibility and Standards: The Economics of Horses, Penguins and Lemmings , 1986 .

[17]  Margit Osterloh,et al.  Trust and Commerce in Open Source - a Contradiction? , 2002 .

[18]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[19]  Neil Gandal,et al.  NETWORK EFFECTS, SOFTWARE PROVISION, AND STANDARDIZATION* , 1992 .

[20]  Nicolas Jullien,et al.  "Libre" software : turning fads into institutions? , 2003 .

[21]  P. David,et al.  The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 , 1990 .