Relationship between measured apparent mass and seat-to-head transmissibility responses of seated occupants exposed to vertical vibration

Abstract The “to-the-body” and “through-the-body” biodynamic response functions of the seated human body exposed to vertical vibration are measured and analyzed in an attempt to identify relationships between the apparent mass and seat-to-head transmissibility measures. The experiments involved 12 male subjects exposed to three magnitudes of whole-body vertical random vibration (0.25,0.5,1.0 m/s2 rms acceleration) in the 0.5–15 Hz frequency range, and seated with three back support conditions (none, vertical and inclined), and two different hands positions (hands in lap and hands on the steering wheel). The vertical apparent mass and seat-to-head transmissibility responses were acquired during the experiments, where the head acceleration was measured using a light and adjustable helmet-strap mounted accelerometer. The results showed that both the measured responses show good agreements in the primary resonances, irrespective of the back support condition, while considerable differences between the normalized apparent mass and seat-to-head transmissibility could be seen in the secondary resonance range for the two back supported postures. The seat-to-head transmissibility responses are further shown to be relatively sensitive to back supported postures compared with that of apparent mass responses. Relatively stronger effects of hands position were observed on the seat-to-head transmissibility responses compared with the apparent mass responses under back supported conditions. From the results, it is further concluded that seat-to-head transmissibility emphasizes the biodynamic response in the vicinity of the secondary resonance compared to the apparent mass. The seat-to-head transmissibility measure is thus considered to be more appropriate for describing seated body response to higher frequency vibration.

[1]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Individual variability and its effect on subjective and biodynamic response to whole-body vibration , 1978 .

[2]  Mothiram K. Patil,et al.  A mathematical model of tractor-occupant system with a new seat suspension for minimization of vibration response , 1988 .

[3]  Neil J Mansfield,et al.  Impedance methods (apparent mass, driving point mechanical impedance and absorbed power) for assessment of the biomechanical response of the seated person to whole-body vibration. , 2005, Industrial health.

[4]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  Whole-body vertical biodynamic response characteristics of the seated vehicle driver: measurement and model development , 1998 .

[5]  S. Rakheja,et al.  Definition of A range of idealized values to characterize seated body biodynamic response under vertical vibration , 1998 .

[6]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  ANALYSES OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BIODYNAMIC RESPONSE FUNCTIONS , 1999 .

[7]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Tri-axial forces at the seat and backrest during whole-body vertical vibration , 2004 .

[8]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Effects of posture and vibration magnitude on apparent mass and pelvis rotation during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration , 2002 .

[9]  M J Griffin,et al.  The transmission of translational seat vibration to the head--I. Vertical seat vibration. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  M J Griffin,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human body: vertical vibration. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  SEATED OCCUPANT APPARENT MASS CHARACTERISTICS UNDER AUTOMOTIVE POSTURES AND VERTICAL VIBRATION , 2002 .

[12]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  Influence of back support conditions on the apparent mass of seated occupants under horizontal vibration. , 2005, Industrial health.

[13]  Ronnie Lundström,et al.  ABSORPTION OF ENERGY DURING WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION EXPOSURE , 1998 .

[14]  C. Bonthoux,et al.  Biodynamic response of the human body in the sitting position when subjected to vertical vibration , 1983 .

[15]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human body in the fore-and-aft and lateral directions , 1990 .

[16]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1971 .

[17]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  Effects of sitting postures on biodynamic response of seated occupants under vertical vibration , 2004 .

[18]  M. Griffin,et al.  Non-linearities in apparent mass and transmissibility during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  R Lundström,et al.  Mechanical impedance of the human body in vertical direction. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  M. Griffin,et al.  A MODAL ANALYSIS OF WHOLE-BODY VERTICAL VIBRATION, USING A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1997 .

[21]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  Effect of Back Support Condition on Seat to Head Transmissibilities of Seated Occupants under Vertical Vibration , 2006 .

[22]  M. Griffin,et al.  MOVEMENT OF THE UPPER-BODY OF SEATED SUBJECTS EXPOSED TO VERTICAL WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION AT THE PRINCIPAL RESONANCE FREQUENCY , 1998 .

[23]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE TRANSMISSION OF TRANSLATIONAL SEAT VIBRATION TO THE HEAD , 1998 .