Microcultural Analysis of Variation in Sharing of Causal Reasoning about Behavior

This article explores the relation of culture to consumption by investigating individual, social, and cultural sources of variation in the sharing of causal reasoning about behavior in two microcultures. The results suggest (1 ) the importance of intracultural variation in the study of culture, (2) differences between experts and novices as a robust source of this variation, (3) novel insights into the relationship between expertise and sociocultural phenomena, and (4) the potential for investigating attitude structure, categorization, and attribution as products of causal reasoning originating from cultural belief systems. The study also demonstrates the synergy created by diverse research methods. Copyright 1996 by the University of Chicago.

[1]  J. McAlexander,et al.  Subcultures of Consumption: An Ethnography of the New Bikers , 1995 .

[2]  Michael R. Waldmann,et al.  Causal models and the acquisition of category structure , 1995 .

[3]  Á. M. Hernáez.  Borgatti, Stephen; Martin Everett i Lin Freeman. UCINET IV. Network Analysis Software. Version 1.0. Columbia: Analytic Technologies, 1992 , 1995 .

[4]  Richard L. Celsi,et al.  An Exploration of High-Risk Leisure Consumption through Skydiving , 1993 .

[5]  L. Barsalou.  Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields , 1992 .

[6]  Melanie Wallendorf,et al.  "We Gather Together": Consumption Rituals of Thanksgiving Day , 1991 .

[7]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  James S. Boster,et al.  The information economy model applied to biological similarity judgment , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[9]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Sociocognitive Analysis of Group Decision Making among Consumers , 1990 .

[10]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  Cognitive psychology and medical diagnosis , 1990 .

[11]  Kathleen M. Galotti,et al.  Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. , 1989 .

[12]  Denis J. Hilton,et al.  Contemporary science and natural explanation : commonsense conceptions of causality , 1988 .

[13]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Lay Theories: Everyday Understanding of Problems in the Social Sciences , 1988 .

[14]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[15]  S. Read,et al.  Constructing causal scenarios: a knowledge structure approach to causal reasoning. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Grant Mccracken.  Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods , 1986 .

[17]  M. Sujan,et al.  Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments , 1985 .

[18]  C. Antaki.  Ordinary explanation in conversation: Causal structures and their defence , 1985 .

[19]  S. Weller.  New Data on Intracultural Variability: The Hot-Cold Concept of Medicine and Illness , 1983 .

[20]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Arthur Kleinman,et al.  Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture , 2023 .

[22]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.