AVIATION SAFETY AND PILOT CONTROL: UNDERSTANDING AND PREVENTING UNFAVORABLE PILOT-VEHICLE INTERACTIONS

Unfavorable aircraft-pilot coupling (APC) events are rare, unexpected, and unintended excursions in aircraft attitude and flight path caused by anomalous interactions between the aircraft and the pilot. Although it is often difficult to pinpoint the cause of specific APC events, a majority of severe APC events result from the deficiencies in the design of the aircraft, especially with regard to the flight control system (FCS), that result in adverse coupling of the pilot with the aircraft. APC events can result if the pilot is operating with a behavioral mode that is inappropriate for the task at hand, and such events are properly ascribed to pilot error. However, the study committee believes that most severe APC events attributed to pilot error are the result of adverse APC that misleads the pilot into taking actions that contribute to the severity of the event. The Committee on Effects of Aircraft-Pilot Coupling on Flight Safety was established by the National Research Council at the request of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The committee evaluated the current state of knowledge about adverse APC and processes that may be used to eliminate it from military and commercial aircraft. The committee analyzed the information it collected and developed a set of findings and recommendations. It concluded that in the short term the risk posed by adverse APC could be reduced by increased awareness of APC possibilities and more disciplined application of existing tools and capabilities throughout the development, test, and certification process.

[1]  David H. Klyde,et al.  Development of a comprehensive PIO theory , 1996 .

[2]  D. Hanke,et al.  Handling Qualities Analysis on Rate Limiting Elements in Flight Control Systems. , 1994 .

[3]  J. W. Smith,et al.  Analysis of longitudinal pilot-induced oscillation tendencies of YF-12 aircraft , 1975 .

[4]  A. W. Langill,et al.  The Analysis of Nonlinear Control Systems , 1963, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace.

[5]  J. C. Gibson The definition, understanding and design of aircraft handling qualities , 1995 .

[6]  Michael Mecham,et al.  PILOTS, A300 SYSTEMS CITED IN NAGOYA CRASH. , 1996 .

[7]  Holger Duda Effects of Rate Limiting Elements in Flight Control Systems - A New PIO-Criterion. , 1995 .

[8]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Pilot-Induced Oscillations and Human Dynamic Behavior , 1995 .

[9]  Lars Rundqwist,et al.  Phase compensation of rate limiters in JAS 39 Gripen , 1996 .

[10]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  PILOT-INDUCED OSCILLATIONS: THEIR CAUSE AND ANALYSIS , 1964 .

[11]  Ralph A'Harrah An alternate control scheme for alleviating aircraft-pilot coupling , 1994 .

[12]  H. Duda Prediction of Adverse Aircraft-Pilot Coupling in the Roll Axis due to Rate Limiting in Flight Control Systems. , 1996 .

[13]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Minimum Flying Qualities. Volume 2. Pilot Modeling for Flying Qualities Applications , 1990 .

[14]  J. J. Buchholz,et al.  SCARLET: DLR Rate Saturation Flight Experiment. , 1995 .

[15]  C. J. Ockier Pilot Induced Oscillations in Helicopters - Three Case Studies. , 1996 .

[16]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Aircraft Dynamics and Automatic Control , 1973 .

[17]  Ralph H Smith,et al.  Handling Quality Requirements for Advanced Aircraft Design: Longitudinal Mode , 1979 .

[18]  George E. Tucker,et al.  Flying quality analysis and flight evaluation of a highly augmented combat rotorcraft , 1991 .

[19]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Proposed Incorporation of Mission-Oriented Flying Qualities into MIL-STD-1797A. , 1994 .

[20]  D. L. Hirsch,et al.  Experimental investigation of pilot dynamics in a pilot-induced oscillation situation. , 1966 .

[21]  P. G. Hamel Rotorcraft-Pilot Coupling. A Critical Issue for Highly Augmented Helicopters? , 1996 .

[22]  Ezra S. Krendel,et al.  Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior , 1974 .

[23]  H. Duda The Open Loop Onset Point - A New Flying Qualities Parameter to Predict A-PC Problems Due to Rate Saturation in FCS. , 1996 .

[24]  Nasa Technical Mote ANALYSIS OF LONGITUDINAL PILOT-INDUCED OSCILLATION TENDENCIES OF YF-12 AIRCRAFT , 1975 .

[25]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Investigation of Interactions Between Limb-Manipulator Dynamics and Effective Vehicle Roll Control Characteristics , 1986 .

[26]  R. A. Hess,et al.  A model-based investigation of manipulator characteristics and pilot/vehicle performance , 1983 .

[27]  Ralph Smith,et al.  Predicting and validating fully-developed PIO , 1994 .

[28]  B. G. Powers Space shuttle pilot-induced-oscillation research testing , 1984 .

[29]  H. W. Bode,et al.  Network analysis and feedback amplifier design , 1945 .

[30]  Technical Systems Aviation Safety and Pilot Control: Understanding and Preventing Unfavorable Pilot-Vehicle Interactions , 1997 .

[31]  Eileen A Bjorkman Flight test evaluation of techniques to predict longitudinal pilot induced oscillations , 1986 .

[32]  D Graham Research on the effect of nonlinearities on tracking performance. AMRL-TR-67-9. , 1967, AMRL-TR. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories.

[33]  Bruce G. Powers,et al.  An Adaptive Stick-Gain to Reduce Pilot-Induced Oscillation Tendencies , 1982 .

[34]  Hugh L. Dryden,et al.  THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION , 1958 .

[35]  G. Bouwer,et al.  Smart Helicopter Concept. Handling Qualities Data Base for Hover and Low Speed Flight. , 1996 .