Tests for genetic association using family data

We use likelihood‐based score statistics to test for association between a disease and a diallelic polymorphism, based on data from arbitrary types of nuclear families. The Nonfounder statistic extends the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) to accommodate affected and unaffected offspring, missing parental genotypes, phenotypes more general than qualitative traits, such as censored survival data and quantitative traits, and residual correlation of phenotypes within families. The Founder statistic compares observed or inferred parental genotypes to those expected in the general population. Here the genotypes of affected parents and those with many affected offspring are weighted more heavily than unaffected parents and those with few affected offspring. We illustrate the tests by applying them to data on a polymorphism of the SRD5A2 gene in nuclear families with multiple cases of prostate cancer. We also use simulations to compare the power of these family‐based statistics to that of the score statistic based on Cox’s partial likelihood for censored survival data, and find that the family‐based statistics have considerably more power when there are many untyped parents. The software program FGAP for computing test statistics is available at http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HRP/epidemiology/FGAP. Genet. Epidemiol. 22:128–145, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  D. Blacker,et al.  Association Tests for Traits with Variable Age at Onset , 2000, Human Heredity.

[2]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Detection of disease genes by use of family data. I. Likelihood-based theory. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  Daniel Rabinowitz,et al.  A Unified Approach to Adjusting Association Tests for Population Admixture with Arbitrary Pedigree Structure and Arbitrary Missing Marker Information , 2000, Human Heredity.

[4]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Detection of disease genes by use of family data. II. Application to nuclear families. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  D. Clayton,et al.  A generalization of the transmission/disequilibrium test for uncertain-haplotype transmission. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  M Knapp,et al.  The transmission/disequilibrium test and parental-genotype reconstruction: the reconstruction-combined transmission/ disequilibrium test. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  N M Laird,et al.  A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  D J Schaid,et al.  Use of parents, sibs, and unrelated controls for detection of associations between genetic markers and disease. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  W. Ewens,et al.  A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  D. Curtis,et al.  Use of siblings as controls in case‐control association studies , 1997, Annals of human genetics.

[11]  G. Wassmer,et al.  The relative efficiency of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium-likelihood and the conditional on parental genotype-likelihood methods for candidate-gene association studies. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  D J Schaid,et al.  Comparison of statistics for candidate-gene association studies using cases and parents. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  W. Ewens,et al.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  Xin Xu,et al.  Implementing a unified approach to family‐based tests of association , 2000, Genetic epidemiology.

[15]  D. Schaid General score tests for associations of genetic markers with disease using cases and their parents , 1996, Genetic epidemiology.

[16]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .