Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Gastrojejunostomy in Psychomotor Retarded Subjects: A Follow-Up Covering 106 Patient Years

Background Whether psychomotor retarded persons should be treated by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or by surgical gastrostomy combined with an antireflux procedure is controversial. Therefore, the authors investigated the feasibility of a PEG and enteral feeding in these patients. Methods Patients referred from specialized institutions for a PEG placement were assessed extensively by a multidisciplinary team. When considered eligible, age and general condition determined the choice of treatment under general anesthesia (group 1) or conscious sedation (group 2). Patients were followed up after 1 and 7 days, 4 and 12 weeks, and thereafter every 6 to 12 weeks. Data were collected prospectively over a period of 5 years until gastrostomy removal, death, or arrival at the censory date, 6 months after PEG placement. The endpoints were 1) to evaluate the procedure and its complications; 2) to discover barriers that impeded adequate nutrition; and 3) to explore the appropriateness of the choice of PEG or percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEJ). Results The procedure was successful in 95% of patients, in every patient in group 1 (35/35; median age, 4.1 years) and in 20 of 23 patients (87%) in group 2 (median age, 22.0 years). There were no procedure-related deaths and no 30-day mortality. Major complications changed from procedure-related problems in the short term (5.4%) to tube-related problems in the long-term (24.1%). Nausea and vomiting interfered with adequate feeding mainly in young children, but dietary adjustments alleviated the symptoms and ensured an adequate intake. The choice of a PEG was incorrect in four patients: surgery was needed twice and two PEGs had to be converted into a PEJ. All seven primarily indicated PEJs seemed justified and of temporary need in five. Conclusions In severely disabled patients, a PEG and adequate enteral nutrition is feasible in the setting of a multidisciplinary approach and protocol-wise follow-up. Yet, anatomic deformities and restricted pulmonary function rendered the procedure more difficult. In cases with obvious aspiration or gastroesophageal reflux, a PEJ combined with acid suppression and prokinetic drugs may be tried before surgery.

[1]  P. Simpson,et al.  Experience with gastrojejunal feeding tubes in children. , 1997, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[2]  W. Yancy,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. , 1996, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[3]  J. Grunow,et al.  Nonendoscopic removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: morbidity and mortality in children. , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  F. Gottrand,et al.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: influence on gastroesophageal reflux. , 1996, Pediatrics.

[5]  G. Holmes,et al.  A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke , 1996, BMJ.

[6]  S. Beasley,et al.  How to avoid complications during percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. , 1995, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[7]  E. Hamaoui Gastroesophageal reflux during gastrostomy feeding. , 1995, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[8]  P. Wallis,et al.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a general hospital: prospective evaluation of indications, outcome, and randomised comparison of two tube designs. , 1994, Gut.

[9]  Mari Oe,et al.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children , 1994 .

[10]  M. Glassman,et al.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children. , 1994, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[11]  C. Albanese,et al.  Percutaneous gastrojejunostomy versus Nissen fundoplication for enteral feeding of the neurologically impaired child with gastroesophageal reflux. , 1993, The Journal of pediatrics.

[12]  R. Russell,et al.  Randomised comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding in patients with persisting neurological dysphagia. , 1992, BMJ.

[13]  A. Gimson,et al.  Assessment of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tube as part of an integrated approach to enteral feeding. , 1992, Gut.

[14]  M. Ginn-Pease,et al.  Sequelae of antireflux surgery in profoundly disabled children. , 1992, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[15]  M. Gauderer Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a 10-year experience with 220 children. , 1991, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[16]  J. Grunow,et al.  Gastroesophageal reflux following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children. , 1989, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[17]  E. Dimagno,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  S. Benjamin,et al.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy effects on gastroesophageal reflux and the lower esophageal sphincter. , 1987, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[19]  S. Schwarz,et al.  Gastroesophageal reflux secondary to gastrostomy tube placement. , 1986, American journal of diseases of children.

[20]  J. Seibert,et al.  Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux following gastrostomy in neurologically impaired patients. , 1985, Pediatrics.

[21]  E. I. Smith,et al.  Protective Antireflux Operation with Feeding Gastrostomy Experience with Children , 1985, Annals of surgery.

[22]  T. Russell,et al.  Percutaneous gastrostomy: A new simplified and cost-effective technique☆ , 1984 .

[23]  J. Ponsky,et al.  Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. , 1980, Journal of pediatric surgery.