A Symbolic Formulation for Analytical Compliance Analysis and Synthesis of Flexure Mechanisms.

This paper presents a symbolic formulation for analytical compliance analysis and synthesis of flexure mechanisms with serial, parallel, or hybrid topologies. Our approach is based on the screw theory that characterizes flexure deformations with motion twists and loadings with force wrenches. In this work, we first derive a symbolic formulation of the compliance and stiffness matrices for commonly used flexure elements, flexure joints, and simple chains. Elements of these matrices are all explicit functions of flexure parameters. To analyze a general flexure mechanism, we subdivide it into multiple structural modules, which we identify as serial, parallel, or hybrid chains. We then analyze each module with the known flexure structures in the library. At last, we use a bottom-up approach to obtain the compliance/stiffness matrix for the overall mechanism. This is done by taking appropriate coordinate transformation of twists and wrenches in space. Four practical examples are provided to demonstrate the approach. A numerical example is employed to compare analytical compliance models against a finite element model. The results show that the errors are sufficiently small (2%, compared with finite element (FE) model), if the range of motion is limited to linear deformations. This work provides a systematical approach for compliance analysis and synthesis of general flexure mechanisms. The symbolic formulation enables subsequent design tasks, such as compliance synthesis or sensitivity analysis.

[1]  Hai-Jun Su Mobility Analysis of Flexure Mechanisms via Screw Algebra , 2011 .

[2]  S. V. Sreenivasan,et al.  Analytical and Experimental Characterization of Parasitic Motion in Flexure-Based Selectively Compliant Precision Mechanisms , 2008 .

[3]  Tien-Fu Lu,et al.  Review of circular flexure hinge design equations and derivation of empirical formulations , 2008 .

[4]  Shilong Zhang,et al.  A Finite-Element-Based Method to Determine the Spatial Stiffness Properties of a Notch Hinge , 2001 .

[5]  F. Dimentberg The screw calculus and its applications in mechanics , 1968 .

[6]  Martin L. Culpepper,et al.  Design of a low-cost nano-manipulator which utilizes a monolithic, spatial compliant mechanism , 2004 .

[7]  J. M. Selig,et al.  A Screw Theory of Timoshenko Beams , 2009 .

[8]  H. Lipkin,et al.  Structure of Robot Compliance , 1993 .

[9]  Shorya Awtar,et al.  A Generalized Constraint Model for Two-Dimensional Beam Flexures: Nonlinear Load-Displacement Formulation , 2010 .

[10]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Kinematic geometry of mechanisms , 1978 .

[11]  Joseph Duffy,et al.  The Elliptic Polarity of Screws , 1985 .

[12]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Compliance Analysis of a Three-Legged Rigidly-Connected Platform Device , 2006 .

[13]  Janusz,et al.  Geometrical Methods in Robotics , 1996, Monographs in Computer Science.

[14]  McCarthy,et al.  Geometric Design of Linkages , 2000 .

[15]  X. Ding,et al.  A screw theory of static beams , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[16]  A. Midha,et al.  A Compliance Number Concept for Compliant Mechanisms, and Type Synthesis , 1987 .

[17]  Josip Loncaric,et al.  Normal forms of stiffness and compliance matrices , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  Seth Earl Elliott,et al.  The theory of screws , 2022 .

[19]  Nicholas G. Dagalakis,et al.  Kinematic Modeling of a 6-Degree of Freedom Tri Stage Micro-Positioner , 2001 .

[20]  Shuguang Huang,et al.  The bounds and realization of spatial compliances achieved with simple serial elastic mechanisms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[21]  J. M. Selig,et al.  On the compliance of coiled springs , 2004 .