Effects of anode position on the responses elicited by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of anode position on the spinal reflex responses evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. Healthy males participated in two experiments. In Experiment 1 (Exp. 1, n = 3), we investigated the effect of anode position on the spinal reflex responses in multiple lower-limb muscles. Experiment 2 (Exp. 2, n = 8) focused on the effect of anode position on the spinal reflex response in the vastus medialis (VM) muscle. In each experiment, electromyographic signals were recorded in the right leg muscle(s). The cathode was placed over the area between the spinous processes of the L1 and L2 vertebrae. The anode was placed over (1) the abdomen (ABD), (2) the ipsilateral (right) anterior superior iliac spine (iASIS), or (3) the contralateral (left) anterior superior iliac spine (cASIS). A double pulse stimulation test was conducted to confirm that the response was due to activation of sensory fibers (i.e. spinal reflex). The results showed that the anode position was critical for inducing the spinal reflex in the VM (Exp. 1). The ratio of second to first responses was smaller when the anode was placed over the ABD or cASIS than when the anode was placed over the iASIS (Exp. 2). In addition, the onset latency of the first response was longer when the anode was placed over the ABD or cASIS than when the anode was placed over the iASIS (Exp. 2). These results showed that the anode should be placed over the ABD or cASIS to effectively elicit spinal reflexes in lower-limb muscles.

[1]  Simon M. Danner,et al.  Body Position Influences Which Neural Structures Are Recruited by Lumbar Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation , 2016, PloS one.

[2]  V Reggie Edgerton,et al.  Spinal segment-specific transcutaneous stimulation differentially shapes activation pattern among motor pools in humans. , 2015, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  R. Stein,et al.  Reduced postactivation depression of soleus H reflex and root evoked potential after transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  S. Harkema,et al.  Phase-dependent modulation of percutaneously elicited multisegmental muscle responses after spinal cord injury. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Dimitrijevic,et al.  Modification of reflex responses to lumbar posterior root stimulation by motor tasks in healthy subjects. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[6]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  Effect of percutaneous stimulation at different spinal levels on the activation of sensory and motor roots , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Frank Rattay,et al.  Posterior root–muscle reflexes elicited by transcutaneous stimulation of the human lumbosacral cord , 2007, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  Simon M. Danner,et al.  Selectivity of transcutaneous stimulation of lumbar posterior roots at different spinal levels in humans , 2013, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[9]  Y. Gerasimenko,et al.  Modulation of multisegmental monosynaptic responses in a variety of leg muscles during walking and running in humans , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  D. Koceja,et al.  Spinal reflex in human lower leg muscles evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  R. Stein,et al.  Post-activation depression in the human soleus muscle using peripheral nerve and transcutaneous spinal stimulation , 2015, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  P. Zehr Considerations for use of the Hoffmann reflex in exercise studies , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.