Model-Based Estimation of Collision Risks of Predatory Birds with Wind Turbines

The expansion of renewable energies, such as wind power, is a promising way of mitigating climate change. Because of the risk of collision with rotor blades, wind turbines have negative effects on local bird populations, particularly on raptors such as the Red Kite (Milvus milvus). Appropriate assessment tools for these effects have been lacking. To close this gap, we have developed an agent-based, spatially explicit model that simulates the foraging behavior of the Red Kite around its aerie in a landscape consisting of different land-use types. We determined the collision risk of the Red Kite with the turbine as a function of the distance between the wind turbine and the aerie and other parameters. The impact function comprises the synergistic effects of species-specific foraging behavior and landscape structure. The collision risk declines exponentially with increasing distance. The strength of this decline depends on the raptor's foraging behavior, its ability to avoid wind turbines, and the mean wind speed in the region. The collision risks, which are estimated by the simulation model, are in the range of values observed in the field. The derived impact function shows that the collision risk can be described as an aggregated function of distance between the wind turbine and the raptor's aerie. This allows an easy and rapid assessment of the ecological impacts of (existing or planned) wind turbines in relation to their spatial location. Furthermore, it implies that minimum buffer zones for different landscapes can be determined in a defensible way. This modeling approach can be extended to other bird species with central-place foraging behavior. It provides a helpful tool for landscape planning aimed at minimizing the impacts of wind power on biodiversity.

[1]  Predicting home range use by golden eagles Aquila chrysaetos in western Scotland , 2002 .

[2]  Karen L. Krijgsveld,et al.  Collision Risk of Birds with Modern Large Wind Turbines , 2009 .

[3]  Hermann Hötker,et al.  Impacts on biodiversity of exploitation of renewable energy , 2006 .

[4]  Marcus Eichhorn,et al.  The mismatch between regional spatial planning for wind power development in Germany and national eligibility criteria for feed-in tariffs—A case study in West Saxony , 2010 .

[5]  K. S. Smallwood,et al.  Burrowing Owl Mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area , 2007 .

[6]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes , 2005 .

[7]  Paul Opdam,et al.  European Nuthatch Metapopulations in a Fragmented Agricultural Landscape , 1991 .

[8]  Karin Johst,et al.  How do crop types influence breeding success in lesser kestrels through prey quality and availability? A modelling approach , 2006 .

[9]  Matthias C. Wichmann,et al.  Global change challenges the Tawny Eagle (Aquila rapax): modelling extinction risk with respect to predicted climate and land use changes , 2004 .

[10]  Silke Bauer,et al.  The consequences of climate-driven stop-over sites changes on migration schedules and fitness of Arctic geese. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[11]  Rowena H. W. Langston,et al.  The distribution of breeding birds around upland wind farms , 2009 .

[12]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[13]  R. Langston,et al.  Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds , 2006 .

[14]  M. Dale Strickland,et al.  Avian Collisions with Wind Turbines: A Summary of Existing Studies and Comparisons to Other Sources of Avian Collision Mortality in the United States , 2001 .

[15]  Volker Grimm,et al.  Using pattern-oriented modeling for revealing hidden information: a key for reconciling ecological theory and application , 2003 .

[16]  Bruno Bruderer,et al.  Flight characteristics of birds:: I. radar measurements of speeds , 2001 .

[17]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  New Computer Models Unify Ecological TheoryComputer simulations show that many ecological patterns can be explained by interactions among individual organisms , 1988 .

[18]  S. Percival.  Birds and windfarms : what are the real issues ? , 2007 .

[19]  Vance A. Tucker,et al.  A mathematical model of bird collisions with wind turbine rotors , 1996 .

[20]  Birgit Müller,et al.  A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , 2006 .

[21]  Karin Johst,et al.  FORAGING IN A PATCHY AND DYNAMIC LANDSCAPE: HUMAN LAND USE AND THE WHITE STORK , 2001 .

[22]  D. P. Whitfield,et al.  Collision fatality of raptors in wind farms does not depend on raptor abundance , 2008 .

[23]  Luis J. Barrios,et al.  Behavioural and environmental correlates of soaring-bird mortality at on-shore wind turbines , 2004 .

[24]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Spatial trade-offs between wind power production and bird collision avoidance in agricultural landscapes. , 2010 .

[25]  W. Band,et al.  Developing field and analytical methods to assess avian collision risk at wind farms , 2007 .

[26]  D. Whitfield,et al.  Upland raptors and the assessment of wind farm impacts , 2006 .

[27]  K. Shawn Smallwood,et al.  Bird Mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California , 2008 .

[28]  D. Chamberlain,et al.  The effect of avoidance rates on bird mortality predictions made by wind turbine collision risk models , 2006 .

[29]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British Birds , 1996 .