Hafted spears and the archaeology of mind

By as early as 200,000 years ago hunters in Africa, the Middle East, and Europe had begun hafting stone points onto the ends of their spears (1⇓–3). This marked a significant step in the history of technology, for it was the first time that hominins had united separate elements into a single tool. Indeed, these compound tools actually consisted of three distinct elements: the point, the shaft, and the haft itself. It was the haft that was the challenge because it had to withstand significant impact forces when the spear was used. Many archaeologists consider the development of hafting to mark a major watershed not just for technology, but for the human mind itself (4). But just what is required, in a cognitive sense, to be able to haft a point to a shaft? In this issue of PNAS, Wadley et al. (5) set out to answer this question by duplicating one such hafting technology, identifying the procedures and knowledge required, and arguing that abstract reasoning was an essential prerequisite. In doing so they provide a good example of a relatively new perspective in paleoanthropology—that of cognitive archaeology.

[1]  M. Vanhaeren,et al.  Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age. , 2005, Journal of human evolution.

[2]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  P. Villa,et al.  Stone tools for the hunt: points with impact scars from a Middle Paleolithic site in southern Italy , 2009 .

[4]  P. Mellars Rethinking the human revolution : new behavioural and biological perspectives on the origin and dispersal of modern humans , 2007 .

[5]  P. V. Peer,et al.  Early evidence of complexity in lithic economy: core-axe production, hafting and use at Late Middle Pleistocene site 8-B-11, Sai Island (Sudan) , 2006 .

[6]  M. Wolpoff Neandertals and modern humans in Western Asia. , 1999 .

[7]  P. Mellars,et al.  The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans , 1991 .

[8]  T. Chaminade,et al.  The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  S. Ambrose Paleolithic Technology and Human Evolution , 2001, Science.

[10]  Julie C. Stout,et al.  Stone Tool-Making and Brain Activation: Position Emission Tomography (PET) Studies , 2000 .

[11]  E. Delson The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives in the Origins of Modern Humans , 1990 .

[12]  Eric Boëda,et al.  Bitumen as Hafting Material on Middle Paleolithic Artifacts from the El Kowm Basin, Syria , 2002 .

[13]  L. Malafouris Beads for a Plastic Mind: the ‘Blind Man's Stick’ (BMS) Hypothesis and the Active Nature of Material Culture , 2008, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[14]  C. Marean,et al.  The Origin of Modern Human Behavior , 2003, Current Anthropology.

[15]  T. Wynn,et al.  Hohlenstein-Stadel and the Evolution of Human Conceptual Thought , 2009 .

[16]  L. Wadley,et al.  Implications for complex cognition from the hafting of tools with compound adhesives in the Middle Stone Age, South Africa , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  R. Botha Prehistoric shell beads as a window on language evolution , 2008 .

[18]  J. Shea The Middle Paleolithic of the East Mediterranean Levant , 2003 .

[19]  R. Byrne,et al.  Differentiation in cognitive and emotional meanings: An evolutionary analysis , 2007 .