A framework for capturing the hidden stakeholder system

As programs rise in intricacy and scope, the number of stakeholders involved also increases, often driving an exponential growth in program complexity. This complexity is caused by the $n^*(n - 1)/2$ stakeholder relationships which form an underlying system that influences all aspects of the program. Understanding, managing, and leveraging this stakeholder system will greatly increase a program's probability of success. This paper provides a framework for capturing this stakeholder system in a series of architectural views. These architectural products document the program's stakeholder concerns and also illustrate how those stakeholders interrelate over the system's lifecycle. The ultimate objective for the framework and use of the resulting products is to allow for right‐sized stakeholder involvement, promote effective use of resources, and increase the probability of overall program success with the assurance of lasting stakeholder commitment. Additionally, this unique insertion of Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis into an Architecture Framework fulfills an original intent of Architecture Framework, capturing the entire sociotechnical enterprise system. ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 16

[1]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[2]  John A. Zachman,et al.  A Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1987, IBM Syst. J..

[3]  Eberhardt Rechtin Systems Architecting: Creating & Building Complex Systems , 1990 .

[4]  A. Berztiss,et al.  Requirements Engineering , 2002, J. Object Technol..

[5]  E. Rechtin,et al.  The art of systems architecting , 1996, IEEE Spectrum.

[6]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[7]  Phil Williams North Atlantic Treaty Organization , 1994 .

[8]  W. Duncan A GUIDE TO THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1996 .

[9]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[10]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[11]  P. C. Nutt Surprising but true: Half the decisions in organizations fail , 1999 .

[12]  E. Rechtin,et al.  The political process and systems architecting , 2000 .

[13]  Terry A. Kuykendall,et al.  Systems Architecting–Creating & Building Complex Systems , 2001 .

[14]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[15]  R. Cross,et al.  The people who make organizations go--or stop. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[16]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: A Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods , 2002 .

[17]  John M. Bryson,et al.  What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: A Guide to Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques , 2003 .

[18]  James M. Bloodgood,et al.  Why Decisions Fail: Avoiding the Blunders and Traps That Lead to Debacles , 2003 .

[19]  詳子 斎藤,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking の拡張とその応用 , 2003 .

[20]  J. Bryson What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .

[21]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  Agile project management , 2021, Project Management, Planning and Control.

[22]  Mark W. Maier,et al.  5.4.3 ANSI/IEEE 1471 and Systems Engineering , 2002, Syst. Eng..

[23]  G. J. Muller,et al.  CAFCR: A Multi-view Method for Embedded Systems Architecting. Balancing Genericity and Specificity , 2004 .

[24]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Case studies of systems engineering and management in systems acquisition , 2004, Syst. Eng..

[25]  Patti Anklam Chapter 27 – Social Network Analysis in the KM Toolkit , 2005 .

[26]  Ken Schwaber Agile Project Management , 2005, XP.

[27]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  Linking social network analysis with the analytic hierarchy process for knowledge mapping in organizations , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[28]  Futuring: The Exploration of the Future , 2005, Utopian Studies.

[29]  M. Rao Chapter 1 – Overview: The Social Life of KM Tools , 2005 .

[30]  Joseph E. Kasser,et al.  How lessons learned from using QFD led to the evolution of a process for creating quality requirements for complex systems , 2007, Syst. Eng..

[31]  Kate Ehrlich,et al.  Searching for experts in the enterprise: combining text and social network analysis , 2007, GROUP.

[32]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Supporting strategic enterprise processes: An analysis of various architectural frameworks , 2007, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[33]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  Rationality in systems engineering: Beyond calculation or political action , 2008, Syst. Eng..

[34]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  Rationality in systems engineering: Beyond calculation or political action , 2008 .

[35]  Robert J. Smillie,et al.  Architecture framework human view: The NATO approach , 2008 .

[36]  C. Prell,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management , 2009, Society & Natural Resources.

[37]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Evaluating product development systems using network analysis , 2009, Syst. Eng..

[38]  Syed Raiyan Ghani Knowledge Management: Tools and Techniques , 2009 .

[39]  Ronald E. Giachetti,et al.  Design of Enterprise Systems: Theory, Architecture, and Methods , 2010 .

[40]  Frederikus J.A.M. van Houten,et al.  Communication: key factor in multidisciplinary system design , 2010 .

[41]  G. Maarten Bonnema Insight, innovation, and the big picture in system design , 2011, Syst. Eng..

[42]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Real Options in Enterprise Architecture: A Holistic Mapping of Mechanisms and Types for Uncertainty Management , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[43]  Harminder Singh,et al.  Managing diverse stakeholders in enterprise systems projects: a control portfolio approach , 2011, J. Inf. Technol..

[44]  A. M. M. Sharif Ullah,et al.  Analysis of Kano‐model‐based customer needs for product development , 2011, Syst. Eng..

[45]  Chris Piaszczyk,et al.  Model Based Systems Engineering with Department of Defense Architectural Framework , 2011, Syst. Eng..

[46]  Dov Dori,et al.  Project management vs. systems engineering management: A practitioners' view on integrating the project and product domains , 2011, Syst. Eng..

[47]  Peter M. Smudde,et al.  A holistic approach to stakeholder management: A rhetorical foundation , 2011 .

[48]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Engineering Systems Multiple‐Domain Matrix: An organizing framework for modeling large‐scale complex systems , 2012, Syst. Eng..