Feminist Economics: Theoretical and Political Dimensions

Feminist economics is a school of economic thought and political action that gained important visibility during the 1990s, although its origins can be dated back to the mid‐19th century. Since then, feminist economics has developed its own concepts, analytical frameworks, and methodologies. With gender as a central category, it seeks a more integral and humane comprehension of the economy and of the processes of inclusion and exclusion taking place in it. In addition, feminist economics has grown into a political practice that aims at improving the functioning of the economic system so that all people can have access to a dignified life on the basis of equality. This article presents a general systematization of these theoretical and political dimensions, particularly focusing on the critique of the neoclassical paradigm and its political correlates. We connect the epistemological, methodological, and conceptual contributions of feminist economics, as well as its propositions for transformative action, to specific debates on economic issues, such as the ecological emergency, crisis and austerity, the commodification of life, and the liberalization of trade.

[1]  Dieter Bögenhold.  From Heterodoxy to Orthodoxy and Vice Versa: Economics and Social Sciences in the Division of Academic Work , 2010, Neglected Links in Economics and Society.

[2]  L. Gálvez-Muñoz,et al.  Neoliberalism Goes Pop and Purple: Postfeminist Empowerment from Beyoncé to Mad Max , 2018 .

[3]  D. Elson.  Plan F: Feminist Plan for a Caring and Sustainable Economy , 2016, Feminist Global Political Economies of the Everyday.

[4]  Lourdes Benería.  Qué es la economía feminista , 2018 .

[5]  M. D. Di Tommaso,et al.  Sex Work and Trafficking: Moving beyond Dichotomies , 2017 .

[6]  Sara Lafuente- Funes.  Egg Donation in the Making: Gender, Selection and (In)Visibilities in the Spanish Bioeconomy of Reproduction , 2017 .

[7]  Lina Gálvez Muñoz,et al.  Género y cuidados: respuestas sociales e institucionales al surgimiento de la sociedad de mercado en el contexto europeo , 2014 .

[8]  Christine Bauhardt.  Solutions to the crisis? The Green New Deal, Degrowth, and the Solidarity Economy: Alternatives to the capitalist growth economy from an ecofeminist economics perspective , 2014 .

[9]  Silvia Federici,et al.  Commons against and beyond capitalism , 2014 .

[10]  G. Waylen,et al.  New Frontiers in Feminist Political Economy , 2013 .

[11]  Óscar Carpintero.  When Heterodoxy Becomes Orthodoxy: Ecological Economics in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , 2013 .

[12]  M. Power.  A social provisioning approach to gender and economic life , 2013 .

[13]  Julian Walker.  Time poverty, gender and well-being: lessons from the Kyrgyz Swiss Swedish Health Programme , 2013 .

[14]  Lina Gálvez Muñoz.  UNA LECTURA FEMINISTA DEL AUSTERICIDIO , 2013 .

[15]  Lucía Del Moral-Espín.  Sobre la necesaria reorganización social de los tiempos: políticas de tiempo, espacios económicos alternativos y bienestar , 2012 .

[16]  Tae-Hee Jo.  Social Provisioning Process and Socio‐Economic Modeling , 2011 .

[17]  D. Elson,et al.  Questioning financial governance from a feminist perspective , 2011 .

[18]  D. Elson.  International Financial Architecture: A view from the kitchen , 2011 .

[19]  Bruce Cronin.  The Diffusion of Heterodox Economics , 2010 .

[20]  J. Nelson.  Sociology, Economics, and Gender: Can Knowledge of the Past Contribute to a Better Future? , 2008, American journal of economics and sociology.

[21]  David Dequech.  Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics , 2007 .

[22]  Q. Wodon,et al.  Measuring Time Poverty and Analyzing its Determinants: Concepts and Application to Guinea , 2006 .

[23]  Spike V. Peterson,et al.  How (the meaning of) gender matters in political economy , 2005 .

[24]  Terisa E. Turner,et al.  INTRODUCTION: EXPLORING FEMINIST ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS / GENDER, DEVELOPMENT, AND SUSTAINABILITY FROM A LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE / AFRICAN PEASANTS AND GLOBAL GENDERED CLASS STRUGGLE FOR THE COMMONS / ECOFEMINIST POLITICAL ECONOMY: INTEGRATING FEMINIST ECONOMICS AND ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS / HABITS OF , 2005 .

[25]  Eva Alfama,et al.  La Virtualización de la Afectividad , 2005 .

[26]  M. Power,et al.  Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics , 2004 .

[27]  N. Kabeer.  Globalization, labor standards, and women's rights: dilemmas of collective (in)action in an interdependent world , 2004 .

[28]  Ingrid Robeyns,et al.  SEN'S CAPABILITY APPROACH AND GENDER INEQUALITY: SELECTING RELEVANT CAPABILITIES , 2003 .

[29]  Stephen R. Gill,et al.  Power, Production and Social Reproduction , 2003 .

[30]  B. Agarwal.  ''Bargaining'' and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household , 1997 .

[31]  S. Karsten.  China's Approach to Social Market Economics: The Chinese variant of Market Socialism Seeks to Escape from the Difficulties of Central Command Planning , 1988 .

[32]  Stephen L. Mangum.  The Male‐Female Comparable Worth Debate: Alternative Economics Perspectives on an Issue That Cuts Across the Social Sciences , 1988 .

[33]  L. Benería.  Conceptualizing the Labor Force: The Underestimation of Women's Economic Activities , 1981 .