Adoption of electronic health records in Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals

PURPOSE This study examined the current prevalence of electronic health records (EHRs) in Korea and identified the factors that impede or facilitate the adoption of EHRs. METHODS We surveyed all tertiary teaching and general hospitals in Korea. The degree to which EHR systems were adopted was evaluated using the previously defined definitions of 'comprehensive' and 'basic' EHRs based on their electronic functionality. The effects of teaching status, size, and location of hospitals on EHR adoption were examined. We also investigated factors that impeded or facilitated the adoption of EHR systems. RESULTS The response rate was 39.0% (122/313), and 37.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31.9-42.6%) of Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals had either basic or comprehensive EHR systems (50.2% of tertiary teaching hospitals, 35.0% of general hospitals). However, only 5.0% (CI 2.6-7.4%) had comprehensive EHR systems. Most Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals, i.e., 87.0% (95% CI, 83.3-90.7%), have implemented computerized provider order-entry (CPOE) systems for medications, with larger hospitals more likely than smaller ones to have adopted some sort of EHRs (p-value<0.001). However, the prevalence of these systems did not differ according to the location of the hospital (metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan). According to the survey data, the capital requirements and high maintenance costs of EHR systems were the major barriers to their adoption, and government reimbursement or incentives were the most requested facilitators of their adoption. CONCLUSION The rate at which EHR and CPOE for medications systems have been adopted by Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals was higher than the rate of adoption by US hospitals. Financial aspects are reported to be the most important facilitators of and barriers to EHR adoption. Government financial support, especially to small hospitals, seems to be essential to promoting the adoption of EHRs by Korean hospitals.

[1]  Rae Woong Park,et al.  Research Paper: Computerized Physician Order Entry and Electronic Medical Record Systems in Korean Teaching and General Hospitals: Results of a 2004 Survey , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  A. Jha,et al.  Meaningful use of electronic health records: the road ahead. , 2010, JAMA.

[3]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  IT adoption of clinical information systems in Austrian and German hospitals: results of a comparative survey with a focus on nursing , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[4]  D W Bates,et al.  Section 1: Health and Clinical Management: Leveraging Information Technology to Improve Quality and Safety , 2007, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[5]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Technology Evaluation: Return on Investment for a Computerized Physician Order Entry System , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Filip De Turck,et al.  Has information technology finally been adopted in Flemish intensive care units? , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[10]  Daniel J. Pallin,et al.  Estimates of Electronic Medical Records in U.S. Emergency Departments , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  C. DesRoches,et al.  A progress report on electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2010, Health affairs.

[12]  Sung-Il Cho,et al.  Changes in job stress, musculoskeletal symptoms, and complaints of unfavorable working conditions among nurses after the adoption of a computerized order communication system , 2004, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[13]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. , 1998, JAMA.

[16]  Stephen E. Lapinsky,et al.  Survey of information technology in Intensive Care Units in Ontario, Canada , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[17]  E. Keeler,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[18]  David W. Bates,et al.  Position Paper: A Proposal for Electronic Medical Records in U.S. Primary Care , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  C. DesRoches,et al.  Electronic health record adoption by children's hospitals in the United States. , 2010, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[20]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Youngsoo Shin,et al.  Introduction And The Current Status Of Hospital Information Systems , 1999 .

[22]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[23]  Hideo Yasunaga,et al.  Computerizing medical records in Japan , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.