Geometric consistency and stability of consumer‐grade digital cameras for accurate spatial measurement

It is known that uncertain internal geometry of consumer-grade digital cameras limits the accuracy of data that can be extracted. These cameras can be calibrated, but the validity of calibration data over a period of time should be carefully assessed before subsequent photogrammetric measurement. This paper examines the geometric stability and manufacturing consistency of a typical low-cost digital camera (Nikon Coolpix 5400) by estimating the degree of similarity between interior orientation parameters (IOP), established over a one- year period. Digital elevation models (DEMs) are extracted with differing interior orientation parameters (IOP) sets and accuracies are compared using data obtained from seven identical cameras. An independent self-calibrating bundle adjustment (GAP) and the Leica Photogrammetry Suite (LPS) software were used to provide these data- sets. Results are presented that indicate the potential of these cameras to maintain their internal geometry in terms of temporal stability and manufacturing consistency. This study also identifies residual systematic error surfaces or "domes", discernible in "DEMs of difference". These are caused by slightly inaccurately estimated lens distortion parameters, which effectively constrain the accuracies achievable with this class of sensor.

[1]  Mark R. Shortis,et al.  Multisensor system self-calibration , 1995, Other Conferences.

[2]  E. Gülch,et al.  NON-METRIC CAMERA CALIBRATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF HISTORICAL BUILDINGS , 2005 .

[3]  J. Fryer,et al.  Metric capabilities of low‐cost digital cameras for close range surface measurement , 2005 .

[4]  Ayman Habib,et al.  Stability Analysis and Geometric Calibration of Off-the-Shelf Digital Cameras , 2005 .

[5]  Zhilin Li,et al.  ON THE MEASURE OF DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL ACCURACY , 2006 .

[6]  J. Mills,et al.  Geometric assessment of the kodak DCS Pro back , 2003 .

[7]  Stuart Robson,et al.  Optag A combined panoramic photogrammetric and radio frequency tagging system for monitoring passenger movements in airports. , 2006 .

[8]  Jim H. Chandler,et al.  The assessment of sediment transport rates by automated digital photogrammetry: Photogram , 1998 .

[9]  Horst A. Beyer,et al.  Calibration modeling and stability testing for the Kodak DC200 series digital still camera , 2000, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[10]  S. I. Granshaw,et al.  BUNDLE ADJUSTMENT METHODS IN ENGINEERING PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2006 .

[11]  Jim H. Chandler,et al.  Photogrammetric Capabilities of the Kodak DC40, DCS420 and DCS460 Digital Cameras , 1999 .

[12]  M. A. Chapman,et al.  Constrained FEM Self-Cali bration , 1997 .

[13]  Horst A. Beyer,et al.  Calibration modelling and stability testing for the Kodak DC200 series digital still camera , 2001 .

[14]  Jim H. Chandler,et al.  THE ARCHIVAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC TECHNIQUE: FURTHER APPLICATION AND DEVELOPMENT , 2006 .

[15]  John G. Fryer,et al.  The Development And Application Of A Simple Methodology For Recording Rock Art Using Consumer‐Grade Digital Cameras , 2007 .

[16]  Stuart Robson,et al.  PRINCIPAL POINT BEHAVIOUR AND CALIBRATION PARAMETER MODELS FOR KODAK DCS CAMERAS , 1998 .

[17]  Anoop M. Pullivelli,et al.  Stability analysis of low‐cost digital cameras for aerial mapping using different georeferencing techniques , 2006 .

[18]  P. Miller.  Applications of 3D Measurement from Images , 2009 .

[19]  C. Fraser,et al.  Digital camera calibration methods: Considerations and comparisons , 2006 .

[20]  T. Clarke,et al.  The Development of Camera Calibration Methods and Models , 1998 .

[21]  Jim H. Chandler,et al.  The accuracy of a river bed moulding/casting system and the effectiveness of a low‐cost digital camera for recording river bed fabric , 2003 .