Guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis (2004)

A definition of osteoporosis was agreed upon at the 1993 consensus conference held in Hong Kong. It states that osteoporosis is “characterized by low bone mass and the microarchitectural deterioration of bony tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture.” This definition had been internationally used without revision until recently, when the definition was significantly changed at a National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus conference in 2000 [1]. According to the consensus statement, osteoporosis is defined as “a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength predisposing a person to an increased risk of fracture.” Bone strength is determined by integrating bone mineral density (BMD) and bone quality. BMD is expressed as grams of mineral per area or volume, and, currently, BMD is defined by the individual peak bone density and the resorption rate from the peak. Bone quality is determined by characteristics of the bone matrix, such as microarchitecture, bone turnover, microdamage accumulation, the degree of calcification, and collagen [2,3]. Currently, it is thought that bone quality may not be clinically assessed by measures other than the determination of bone metabolism with biochemical markers of bone turnover. The change in definition may be the result of more recent findings [4], one that demonstrates bone fractures routinely occur despite patients having modest BMD levels, and another that has shown no significant reduction in the risk of a fracture occurring in patients taking one of the two standard medications, one that significantly increases BMD and the other that moderately increases it.

[1]  R. Heaney,et al.  Is the paradigm shifting? , 2003, Bone.

[2]  R. Eastell,et al.  Relationship of Early Changes in Bone Resorption to the Reduction in Fracture Risk With Risedronate , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  R. Weinstein True Strength , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  Hajime Orimo,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision , 2001, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[5]  P. Delmas,et al.  Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover, Endogenous Hormones and the Risk of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: The OFELY Study , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  C Marcelli,et al.  Markers of bone resorption predict hip fracture in elderly women: The EPIDOS prospective study , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  P. Ross,et al.  Serum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase and Calcaneus Bone Density Predict Fractures: A Prospective Study , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  D. C. Bauer,et al.  Clinical Use of Biochemical Markers of Bone Remodeling: Current Status and Future Directions , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[9]  Y. Taketani,et al.  Effect of raloxifene on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  B. Riggs,et al.  Practical clinical application of biochemical markers of bone turnover: Consensus of an expert panel. , 1999, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[11]  C. Chesnut,et al.  Perspective: Reconsidering the Effects of Antiresorptive Therapies in Reducing Osteoporotic Fracture , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  R. Parker,et al.  Early Changes in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover Predict the Long‐Term Response to Alendronate Therapy in Representative Elderly Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Changes in bone mineral density explain little of the reduction in vertebral or nonvertebral fracture risk with anti-resorptive therapy. , 2004, Bone.

[14]  Antiresorptive treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: comparison of study designs and outcomes in large clinical trials with fracture as an endpoint. , 2002, Endocrine reviews.

[15]  K. Kaneda,et al.  A Double-Masked Multicenter Comparative Study Between Alendronate and Alfacalcidol in Japanese Patients with Osteoporosis , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  R. Eastell,et al.  The Use of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in Osteoporosis , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[17]  Fran Harris,et al.  Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.