Characterization of between-receiver GPS-Galileo inter-system biases and their effect on mixed ambiguity resolution

The Global Positioning System (GPS) and Galileo will transmit signals on similar frequencies, that is, the L1–E1 and L5–E5a frequencies. This will be beneficial for mixed GPS and Galileo applications in which the integer carrier phase ambiguities need to be resolved, in order to estimate the positioning unknowns with centimeter accuracy or better. In this contribution, we derive the mixed GPS + Galileo model that is based on “inter-system” double differencing, that is, differencing the Galileo phase and code observations relative to those corresponding to the reference or pivot satellite of GPS. As a consequence of this, additional between-receiver inter-system bias (ISB) parameters need to be solved as well for both phase and code data. We investigate the size and variability of these between-receiver ISBs, estimated from L1 and L5 observations of GPS, as well as E1 and E5a observations of the two experimental Galileo In-Orbit Validation Element (GIOVE) satellites. The data were collected using high-grade multi-GNSS receivers of different manufacturers for several zero- and short-baseline setups in Australia and the USA. From this analysis, it follows that differential ISBs are only significant for receivers of different types and manufacturers; for baselines formed by identical receiver types, no differential ISBs have shown up; thus, implying that the GPS and GIOVE data are then fully interoperable. Fortunately, in case of different receiver types, our analysis also indicates that the phase and code ISBs may be calibrated, since their estimates, based on several datasets separated in time, are shown to be very stable. When the single-frequency (E1) GIOVE phase and code data of different receiver types are a priori corrected for the differential ISBs, the short-baseline instantaneous ambiguity success rate increases significantly and becomes comparable to the success rate of mixed GPS + GIOVE ambiguity resolution based on identical receiver types.

[1]  Christian Tiberius,et al.  Short and zero baseline analysis of GPS L1 C/A, L5Q, GIOVE E1B, and E5aQ signals , 2011, GPS Solutions.

[2]  P. Teunissen.  The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation , 1995 .

[3]  Dennis Milbert.  Influence of Pseudorange Accuracy on Phase Ambiguity Resolution in Various GPS Modernization Scenarios , 2005 .

[4]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  A canonical theory for short GPS baselines. Part II: the ambiguity precision and correlation , 1997 .

[5]  Massimo Crisci,et al.  Multilpath and Tracking Performance of Galileo Ranging Signals Transmitted by GIOVE-A , 2007 .

[6]  C. Tiberius,et al.  Geometry-free undifferenced, single and double differenced analysis of single frequency GPS, EGNOS and GIOVE-A/B measurements , 2009 .

[7]  Christian C. J. M. Tiberius,et al.  Short and zero baseline analysis of GPS L 1 C / A , L 5 Q , GIOVE E 1 B , and E 5 aQ signals , 2011 .

[8]  Bernhard Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  GNSS - Global Navigation Satellite Systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and more , 2007 .

[9]  J.H. Hahn,et al.  Implementation of the GPS to Galileo time offset (GGTO) , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and Exposition, 2005..

[10]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  Characterization of GPS/GIOVE sensor stations in the CONGO network , 2011 .

[11]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Integrated GPS/GIOVE Precise Point Positioning , 2010 .

[12]  Marcus Andreotti,et al.  The Accuracy Potential of Galileo E5/E1 Pseudoranges for Surveying and Mapping , 2011 .

[13]  Blair Fonville,et al.  ACCOUNTING FOR TIMING BIASES BETWEEN GPS, MODERNIZED GPS, AND GALILEO SIGNALS , 2005 .

[14]  B. Bonhoure,et al.  GPS - GIOVE Mixed PVT Experimentation , 2009 .