Perturbation solution of the coupled Stokes-Darcy problem

Microfiltration of particles is modelled by the motion of particles embedded in a Stokes flow near a porous membrane in which Darcy equations apply. Stokes flow also applies on the other side of the membrane. A pressure gradient is applied across the membrane. Beavers and Joseph slip boundary condition applies along the membrane surfaces. This coupled Stokes-Darcy problem is solved by a perturbation method, considering that the particle size is much larger than the pores of the membrane. The formal asymptotic solution is developed in detail up to 3rd order. The method is applied to the example case of a spherical particle moving normal to a membrane. The solution, limited here to an impermeable slip surface (described from 3rd order expansion), uses as an intermediate step the boundary integral technique for Stokes flow near an impermeable surface with a no-slip boundary condition. Results of the perturbation solution are in good agreement with O'Neill and Bhatt analytical solution for this case.

[1]  M. E. O'neill,et al.  SLOW MOTION OF A SOLID SPHERE IN THE PRESENCE OF A NATURALLY PERMEABLE SURFACE , 1991 .

[2]  Settling motion of interacting solid particles in the vicinity of a plane solid boundary , 2005 .

[3]  Jens Harting,et al.  Roughness induced boundary slip in microchannel flows. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[4]  P. Saffman On the Boundary Condition at the Surface of a Porous Medium , 1971 .

[5]  Massoud Kaviany,et al.  Slip and no-slip velocity boundary conditions at interface of porous, plain media , 1992 .

[6]  M. Bonnet Boundary Integral Equation Methods for Solids and Fluids , 1999 .

[7]  R. Rosner,et al.  A multi-scale character of the large-scale coherent dynamics in the Rayleigh-Taylor instability , 2005 .

[8]  Willi Jäger,et al.  On The Interface Boundary Condition of Beavers, Joseph, and Saffman , 2000, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[9]  C. Pozrikidis,et al.  Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow: Green's functions , 1992 .

[10]  Jeng-Tzong Chen,et al.  A Practical Guide to Boundary Element Methods with the Software Library BEMLIB , 2002 .

[11]  E. Sparrow,et al.  Boundary condition at a porous surface which bounds a fluid flow , 1974 .

[12]  D. Joseph,et al.  Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Andreas Knorr,et al.  Zero-phonon linewidth and phonon satellites in the optical absorption of nanowire-based quantum dots. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[14]  Luiz C. Wrobel,et al.  Boundary Integral Methods in Fluid Mechanics , 1995 .

[15]  M. Velarde,et al.  Momentum transport at a fluid–porous interface , 2003 .

[16]  Gleb E Yakubov,et al.  Surface roughness and hydrodynamic boundary conditions. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  J. Blake,et al.  A note on the image system for a stokeslet in a no-slip boundary , 1971, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[18]  P. Schmitz,et al.  Hydrodynamic aspects of crossflow microfiltration. Analysis of particle deposition at the membrane surface , 1992 .

[19]  P. Szymczak,et al.  Drag force on a sphere moving towards a corrugated wall , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  Nikolai V Priezjev,et al.  The effective slip length and vortex formation in laminar flow over a rough surface , 2008, 0810.1552.

[21]  Massimiliano Giona,et al.  Laminar dispersion at high Péclet numbers in finite-length channels: Effects of the near-wall velocity profile and connection with the generalized Leveque problem , 2009 .

[22]  J. Happel,et al.  Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics , 1965 .