Automated measurement of CT noise in patient images with a novel structure coherence feature

While the assessment of CT noise constitutes an important task for the optimization of scan protocols in clinical routine, the majority of noise measurements in practice still rely on manual operation, hence limiting their efficiency and reliability. This study presents an algorithm for the automated measurement of CT noise in patient images with a novel structure coherence feature. The proposed algorithm consists of a four-step procedure including subcutaneous fat tissue selection, the calculation of structure coherence feature, the determination of homogeneous ROIs, and the estimation of the average noise level. In an evaluation with 94 CT scans (16 517 images) of pediatric and adult patients along with the participation of two radiologists, ROIs were placed on a homogeneous fat region at 99.46% accuracy, and the agreement of the automated noise measurements with the radiologists' reference noise measurements (PCC  =  0.86) was substantially higher than the within and between-rater agreements of noise measurements (PCCwithin  =  0.75, PCCbetween  =  0.70). In addition, the absolute noise level measurements matched closely the theoretical noise levels generated by a reduced-dose simulation technique. Our proposed algorithm has the potential to be used for examining the appropriateness of radiation dose and the image quality of CT protocols for research purposes as well as clinical routine.

[1]  O. Linton,et al.  NCRP REPORT NO. 160, IONIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE OF THE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES, MEDICAL EXPOSURE—ARE WE DOING LESS WITH MORE, AND IS THERE A ROLE FOR HEALTH PHYSICISTS? , 2009, Health physics.

[2]  Stefan Ulzheimer,et al.  CT dose and image quality in the last three scanner generations. , 2013, World journal of radiology.

[3]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. , 2004, Radiology.

[4]  R. Agid,et al.  Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between Fixed Tube Current and Combined Automatic Tube Current Modulation in Craniocervical CT Angiography , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  John M Boone,et al.  Reply to "Comment on the 'Report of AAPM TG 204: Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations'" [AAPM Report 204, 2011]. , 2012, Medical physics.

[6]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Automated Technique to Measure Noise in Clinical CT Examinations. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  H. Goo,et al.  The Optimal Parameter for Radiation Dose in Pediatric Low Dose Abdominal CT: Cross-sectional Dimensions versus Body Weight , 2008 .

[8]  Martin Jägersand,et al.  FEM-based automatic segmentation of muscle and fat tissues from thoracic CT images , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[9]  Anthony P. Reeves,et al.  Local noise estimation in low-dose chest CT images , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[10]  Sheila Weinmann,et al.  The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. , 2013, JAMA pediatrics.

[11]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Rochester,et al.  Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT: The Report of AAPM Task Group 220. , 2014, AAPM report.

[13]  Sheila Weinmann,et al.  Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. , 2012, JAMA.

[14]  Jong Hyo Kim,et al.  Realistic simulation of reduced-dose CT with noise modeling and sinogram synthesis using DICOM CT images. , 2013, Medical physics.

[15]  Dieter Ropers,et al.  Patient-specific predictors of image noise in coronary CT angiography. , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[16]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  P. F. Judy,et al.  Phantoms for Performance Evaluation and Quality Assurance of CT Scanners , 1977 .

[18]  Raymond P. Rossi,et al.  Specification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners , 1993 .

[19]  Division on Earth Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[20]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. , 2009, Medical physics.

[21]  M. Kalra,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction With Chest Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Initial Experience , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  Zeyun Yu,et al.  Structure Tensor Based Image Interpolation Method , 2014, ArXiv.