Factors Mediating Learning and Application of Computational Modeling by Life Scientists

This Work-in-Progress paper in the Research Category uses a retrospective mixed-methods study to better understand the factors that mediate learning of computational modeling by life scientists. Key stakeholders, including leading scientists, universities and funding agencies, have promoted computational modeling to enable life sciences research and improve the translation of genetic and molecular biology high-throughput data into clinical results. Software platforms to facilitate computational modeling by biologists who lack advanced mathematical or programming skills have had some success, but none has achieved widespread use among life scientists. Because computational modeling is a core engineering skill of value to other STEM fields, it is critical for engineering and computer science educators to consider how we help students from across STEM disciplines learn computational modeling. Currently we lack sufficient research on how best to help life scientists learn computational modeling.To address this gap, in 2017, we observed a short-format summer course designed for life scientists to learn computational modeling. The course used a simulation environment designed to lower programming barriers. We used semi-structured interviews to understand students’ experiences while taking the course and in applying computational modeling after the course. We conducted interviews with graduate students and post-doctoral researchers who had completed the course. We also interviewed students who took the course between 2010 and 2013. Among these past attendees, we selected equal numbers of interview subjects who had and had not successfully published journal articles that incorporated computational modeling. This Work-in-Progress paper applies social cognitive theory to analyze the motivations of life scientists who seek training in computational modeling and their attitudes towards computational modeling. Additionally, we identify important social and environmental variables that influence successful application of computational modeling after course completion. The findings from this study may therefore help us educate biomedical and biological engineering students more effectively.Although this study focuses on life scientists, its findings can inform engineering and computer science education more broadly. Insights from this study may be especially useful in aiding incoming engineering and computer science students who do not have advanced mathematical or programming skills and in preparing undergraduate engineering students for collaborative work with life scientists.

[1]  Melvin Greer,et al.  Convergence: a transformative approach to advanced research at the intersection of life, physical sciences and engineering and enhanced university-industry partnerships , 2016 .

[2]  E. Arias,et al.  Mortality in the United States, 2016. , 2017, NCHS data brief.

[3]  Helen Burke,et al.  Social cognitive theory, metacognition, and simulation learning in nursing education. , 2012, The Journal of nursing education.

[4]  Jeannette M. Wing Computational thinking and thinking about computing , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  David M. Umulis,et al.  The Role of Mathematical Models in Understanding Pattern Formation in Developmental Biology , 2015, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[6]  S. Hockfield,et al.  Convergence: The future of health , 2017, Science.

[7]  M. Gribskov,et al.  Making models match measurements: model optimization for morphogen patterning networks. , 2014, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[8]  Abbas Shirinifard,et al.  Multi-scale modeling of tissues using CompuCell3D. , 2012, Methods in cell biology.

[9]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  Precocious Albion: A New Interpretation of the British Industrial Revolution , 2013 .

[10]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Null effects of boot camps and short-format training for PhD students in life sciences , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Matthew J. Miller,et al.  Social cognitive model of adjustment to engineering majors: Longitudinal test across gender and race/ethnicity , 2015 .

[12]  Shu-Ling Wang,et al.  The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[13]  J. Scannell,et al.  Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  James A Glazier,et al.  Multicell simulations of development and disease using the CompuCell3D simulation environment. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[15]  Lisa DaVia Rubenstein,et al.  How teachers perceive factors that influence creativity development: Applying a Social Cognitive Theory perspective , 2018 .

[16]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics , 2017 .

[17]  David M. Umulis,et al.  Quantitative model analysis with diverse biological data: applications in developmental pattern formation. , 2013, Methods.

[18]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[19]  Gregery T. Buzzard,et al.  Model-Based Analysis for Qualitative Data: An Application in Drosophila Germline Stem Cell Regulation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Shuchi Grover,et al.  Shuchi Grover and Roy Pea 12 : A Review of the State of the Field − Computational Thinking in , 2013 .

[21]  Melanie I. Stefan,et al.  The Quantitative Methods Boot Camp: Teaching Quantitative Thinking and Computing Skills to Graduate Students in the Life Sciences , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..