The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center

BackgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most technically difficult abdominal operations. Recent advances have allowed surgeons to attempt PD using minimally invasive surgery techniques. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the learning curve of a single surgeon who had carried out his first 100 robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) in a high-volume pancreatic center.MethodsThe data on consecutive patients who underwent RPD for malignant or benign pathologies were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The data included the demographic data, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative length of hospital stay, morbidity rate, mortality rate, and final pathological results. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the inflexion points which corresponded to the learning curve.ResultsBetween 2012 and 2016, 100 patients underwent RPD by a single surgeon. From the CUSUM operation time (CUSUM OT) learning curve, two distinct phases of the learning process were identified (early 40 patients and late 60 patients). The operation time (mean, 418 min vs. 317 min), hospital stay (mean, 22 days vs. 15 days), and estimated blood loss (mean, 227 ml vs. 134 ml) were significantly lower after the first 40 patients (P < 0.05). The pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, and reoperation rates also decreased in the late 60 patients group (P < 0.05). Non-significant reductions were observed in the incidences of major (Clavien–Dindo Grade II or higher) morbidity, postoperative death, bile leakage, gastric fistula, wound infection, and open conversion.ConclusionsRPD was technically feasible and safe in selected patients. The learning curve was completed after 40 RPD. Further studies are required to confirm the long-term oncological outcomes of RPD.

[1]  C. V. van Eijck,et al.  Prognostic value of lymph node metastases detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic or periampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[2]  Jia-fei Yan,et al.  Analysis of learning curve for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 2016, Journal of visualized surgery.

[3]  B. Edil,et al.  Challenges of minimally invasive pancreas surgery growth with such a high learning curve. , 2015, JAMA surgery.

[4]  R Matthew Walsh,et al.  Robotic surgery of the pancreas: The current state of the art , 2015, Journal of surgical oncology.

[5]  M. Del Chiaro,et al.  The State of the Art of Robotic Pancreatectomy , 2014, BioMed research international.

[6]  J. Weitz,et al.  [Robotic Pancreatic Surgery]. , 2016, Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie.

[7]  A. Pomp,et al.  Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy , 1994, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  C. Tang,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy--a comparative study. , 2012, International journal of surgery.

[9]  X. Wu,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  R. Swan,et al.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond. , 2015, Journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[11]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States , 2002 .

[12]  Rong Liu,et al.  Robotic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial , 2020, Trials.

[13]  C. Boselli,et al.  Robotic versus Laparoscopic Approach in Colonic Resections for Cancer and Benign Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  E. Benedetti,et al.  Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Comparative Study at a Single Institution , 2011, World Journal of Surgery.

[15]  U. Wittel,et al.  Prognostic Role of Log Odds of Lymph Nodes After Resection of Pancreatic Head Cancer , 2016, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[16]  A. Coratti,et al.  Minimally invasive surgical approach to pancreatic malignancies. , 2015, World journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[17]  Zhaoda Zhang,et al.  Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a CUSUM Analysis , 2016, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[18]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  Robot-Assisted Pancreatic Surgery: A Structured Approach to Standardization of a Program and of the Operation , 2020, Visceral Medicine.

[19]  G. Pittau,et al.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: hybrid surgical technique. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[20]  S. Chalikonda,et al.  Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[21]  T. Yeh,et al.  Systemic Review of the Feasibility and Advantage of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2016, World Journal of Surgery.

[22]  U. Boggi,et al.  The Learning Curve in Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2016, Digestive Surgery.

[23]  J. Marescaux,et al.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: State of the art. , 2016, Journal of visceral surgery.

[24]  J. Yu,et al.  A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon’s contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer , 2006, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[25]  C. Kang,et al.  First experience of pancreaticoduodenectomy using Revo-i in a patient with insulinoma , 2020, Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.

[26]  W. Qiu,et al.  Short-term Outcomes After Robot-Assisted vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy After the Learning Curve , 2020, JAMA surgery.

[27]  Kyubo Kim,et al.  Impact of Resection Margin Distance on Survival of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2016, Cancer research and treatment : official journal of Korean Cancer Association.

[28]  C. Bassi,et al.  Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery – a review , 2015, Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques.

[29]  M. Talamini,et al.  Outcomes Improvement Is Not Continuous Along the Learning Curve for Pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Hospital Level , 2015, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[30]  Hong-zhao Li,et al.  Cumulative Sum Analysis of the Operator Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Mayo Clinic Level I–IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy Associated with Renal Carcinoma: A Study of 120 Cases at a Single Center , 2020, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[31]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Does Minimally-Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy Have Advantages over Its Open Method? A Meta-Analysis of Retrospective Studies , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  Rong Liu,et al.  The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[33]  Hongbo Wei,et al.  Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach Compared With Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Feasibility and Safety , 2014, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[34]  J. Weitz,et al.  Roboterchirurgie des Pankreas , 2016, Zentralblatt für Chirurgie – Zeitschrift für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.

[35]  Dinesh Vyas,et al.  Jury is Out: Robotic or Laparoscopic or Open Surgery. , 2015, American journal of robotic surgery.

[36]  U. Boggi,et al.  Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2013, The British journal of surgery.

[37]  Yuman Fong,et al.  Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[38]  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán,et al.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions. , 2016, World journal of gastroenterology.

[39]  T Becker,et al.  [Robot-assisted Pylorus-Preserving Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Kausch-Whipple Procedure)]. , 2016, Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie.