Estimation of hydraulic conductivity from borehole flowmeter tests considering head losses

Abstract Recent numerical studies have demonstrated that the conventional interpretation of the borehole flowmeter test (BFT) may lead to considerable errors in estimates of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity ( K r ) due to neglect of head loss across the electromagnetic borehole flowmeter (EBF). Even in uniform aquifers, the conventional interpretation underestimates K r at the base and overestimates K r at the top of the aquifer. In this paper, we derive exact analytical solutions for hydraulic head and streamlines induced by the BFT in a confined homogeneous aquifer. The solutions explicitly consider head loss across the EBF. The derived analytical solutions for head distribution in the vicinity of the pumping well and for volumetric flux to the well sections above and below the EBF can be used to interpret field BFT data. In uniform aquifers, this approach can be applied to obtain estimates of K r from the conventional interpretation. Applications of this approach to the BFT field data set from a highly heterogeneous aquifer indicate that the constraint of aquifer homogeneity limits the applicability of this approach, but it can provide useful insights into the mechanism of flux redistribution near the borehole during the BFT.

[1]  Theory of Dipole Flow in Uniform Anisotropic Aquifers , 1996 .

[2]  Brian R. Zurbuchen,et al.  Dynamic interpretation of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers , 2002 .

[3]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  The Impeller Meter for measuring aquifer permeability variations: Evaluation and comparison with other tests , 1989 .

[4]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  Evaluation of flowmeter-head loss effects in the flowmeter test , 1999 .

[5]  A. D. Young,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics , 1968 .

[6]  W. G. Gray,et al.  Computational methods in water resources X , 1994 .

[7]  Brian R. Zurbuchen,et al.  Field study of hydraulic conductivity in a heterogeneous aquifer: Comparison of single‐borehole measurements using different instruments , 2003 .

[8]  V. Zlotnik,et al.  Modification of Dagan’s Numerical Method for Slug and Packer Test Interpretation , 1994 .

[9]  Z. Kabala,et al.  Response of a partially penetrating well in a heterogeneous aquifer: integrated well-face flux vs. uniform well-face flux boundary conditions , 1997 .

[10]  S. C. Young,et al.  Characterization of High‐K Pathways by Borehole Flowmeter and Tracer Tests , 1995 .

[11]  Alfred E. Hess,et al.  Identifying hydraulically conductive fractures with a slow-velocity borehole flowmeter , 1986 .

[12]  Effect of Boundary Conditions on Dipole Flow , 1994 .

[13]  E. C. Childs.  Dynamics of fluids in Porous Media , 1973 .

[14]  P. Witherspoon,et al.  A Method of Analyzing Transient Fluid Flow in Multilayered Aquifers , 1969 .

[15]  Vitaly A. Zlotnlk,et al.  Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations: 2. Hydraulic conductivity identification, method verification, and field applications , 1998 .

[16]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  In-Well Hydraulics of the Electromagnetic Borehole Flowmeter , 1999 .

[17]  Steven C. Young.  Impacts of Positive Skin Effects on Borehole Flowmeter Tests in a Heterogeneous Granular Aquifer , 1998 .

[18]  Hubert S. Pearson,et al.  The Electromagnetic Borehole Flowmeter: Description and Application , 1995 .

[19]  Richard W. Hamming,et al.  Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers , 1963 .

[20]  Chuen Hon Arthur Cheng,et al.  Characterization of Fracture Permeability with High‐Resolution Vertical Flow Measurements During Borehole Pumping , 1987 .

[21]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  Borehole Flowmeter Application in Fluvial Sediments: Methodology, Results, and Assessment , 1997 .

[22]  S. C. Young,et al.  Development And Application Of Borehole Flowmeters For Environmental Assessment , 1993 .

[23]  Alain Dassargues,et al.  La simulation du transport des nitrates dans un aquifère crayeux du Crétacé en Belgique: approche expérimentale et numérique , 1993 .