Comparisons of Torque Performance in Surface-Mounted PM Vernier Machines With Different Stator Tooth Topologies

Permanent magnet vernier (PMV) machines, as one of the flux modulation machines, have gained considerable attention due to inherent high torque density and low torque ripple. This paper mainly investigates the torque performance of PMV machines with different stator tooth topologies. First, it begins with the theoretical analysis of surface-mounted PMV machines, which has a generic number of flux modulation poles (FMPs), PM poles, and armature poles. Then, the expression of flux linkage, back-electromotive force (EMF) and electromagnetic torque are derived successively, where the equivalent winding factor is proposed and defined to evaluate the flux modulation of stator auxiliary teeth and multi-harmonics coupling effect. Next, the back EMF, torque, power factor, flux-weakening capability, and PM demagnetization of PMV machines with different number of stator teeth are analyzed and compared. The final results of theoretical analysis and finite-element analysis can match well. Meanwhile, the non-uniform distribution of FMPs for increasing the average torque is first proposed and analyzed. A parameter K titled as FMP ratio is defined to evaluate the relationship among the angles among FMPs, the influence of the variation of K on the back EMF and torque is deeply explored and analyzed. Besides, the optimal range of K is carefully validated, which will help to optimize the design parameters more conveniently in the future.

[1]  C. H. Lee,et al.  Vernier Motor and Its Desin , 1963 .

[2]  J T Chen,et al.  A Novel E-Core Switched-Flux PM Brushless AC Machine , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[3]  Ion Boldea,et al.  Theoretical characterization of flux reversal machine in low-speed servo drives-the pole-PM configuration , 2002 .

[4]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Instantaneous magnetic field distribution in brushless permanent magnet DC motors. I. Open-circuit field , 1993 .

[5]  Ronghai Qu,et al.  Inductance Evaluation and Sensorless Control of a Concentrated Winding PM Vernier Machine , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[6]  Wenlong Li,et al.  Harmonic Analysis and Comparison of Permanent Magnet Vernier and Magnetic-Geared Machines , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  Ronghai Qu,et al.  Advanced High Torque Density PM Vernier Machine With Multiple Working Harmonics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[8]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  Performance comparison of dual airgap and single airgap spoke-type Vernier permanent magnet machines , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC).

[9]  Ronghai Qu,et al.  Topologies and analysis of flux-modulation machines , 2015, 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[10]  Xiaoyong Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Comparison for Fractional-Slot Concentrated-Winding Configurations of Permanent-Magnet Vernier Machines , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[11]  Weizhong Fei,et al.  A Novel Permanent-Magnet Flux Switching Machine With an Outer-Rotor Configuration for In-Wheel Light Traction Applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[12]  T. Lipo,et al.  Operation and Design Principles of a PM Vernier Motor , 2014 .

[13]  Akira Ishizaki,et al.  Theory and optimum design of PM Vernier motor , 1995 .

[14]  Yunkai Huang,et al.  Air-Gap Flux Density Characteristics Comparison and Analysis of Permanent Magnet Vernier Machines With Different Rotor Topologies , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[15]  Ming Cheng,et al.  Comparative Analysis and Experimental Verification of an Effective Permanent-Magnet Vernier Machine , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[16]  S. Ho,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Novel Vernier Permanent Magnet Machines , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[17]  L. Tutelea,et al.  Theoretical characterization of three phase flux reversal machine with rotor-PM flux concentration , 2012, 2012 13th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM).

[18]  Ronghai Qu,et al.  Analysis and Design of Triple-Rotor Axial-Flux Spoke-Array Vernier Permanent Magnet Machines , 2018 .

[19]  S. A. Nasar,et al.  Three-phase flux reversal machine (FRM) , 1999 .

[20]  I. Boldea,et al.  The flux-reversal machine: a new brushless doubly-salient permanent-magnet machine , 1996, IAS '96. Conference Record of the 1996 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Thirty-First IAS Annual Meeting.

[21]  Chris Gerada,et al.  Design Considerations for a Fault-Tolerant Flux-Switching Permanent-Magnet Machine , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[22]  Ronghai Qu,et al.  Analysis of a Dual-Rotor, Toroidal-Winding, Axial-Flux Vernier Permanent Magnet Machine , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[23]  T. Lipo,et al.  Novel dual-excitation permanent magnet Vernier machine , 1999, Conference Record of the 1999 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Forth IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.99CH36370).

[24]  Congxiao Wang,et al.  Characterization of three phase flux reversal machine as an automotive generator , 2001 .

[25]  Ronghai Qu,et al.  Analysis of Fractional-Slot Concentrated Winding PM Vernier Machines With Regular Open-Slot Stators , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[26]  Ronghai Qu,et al.  Relationship between magnetic gears and vernier machines , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems.

[27]  J. T. Chen,et al.  Influence of Slot Opening on Optimal Stator and Rotor Pole Combination and Electromagnetic Performance of Switched-Flux PM Brushless AC Machines , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[28]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  Generic torque-maximizing design methodology of surface permanent-magnet vernier machine , 2000 .