A comparative study of conservation and variation scores

BackgroundConservation and variation scores are used when evaluating sites in a multiple sequence alignment, in order to identify residues critical for structure or function. A variety of scores are available today but it is not clear how different scores relate to each other.ResultsWe applied 25 conservation and variation scores to alignments from the Catalytic Site Atlas (CSA). We calculated distances among scores based on correlation coefficients, and constructed a dendrogram of the scores by average linking cluster analysis. The cluster analysis showed that most scores fall into one of two groups--substitution matrix based group and frequency based group respectively. We also evaluated the scores' performance in predicting catalytic sites and found that frequency based scores generally perform best.ConclusionsConservation and variation scores can be classified into mainly two large groups. When using a score to predict catalytic sites, frequency based scores that also consider a background distribution are most successful.

[1]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  A family of evolution-entropy hybrid methods for ranking protein residues by importance. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Olivier Poch,et al.  BAliBASE 3.0: Latest developments of the multiple sequence alignment benchmark , 2005, Proteins.

[4]  Itay Mayrose,et al.  ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Mona Singh,et al.  Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation , 2007, Bioinform..

[6]  L. Mirny,et al.  Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  C. Sander,et al.  Database of homology‐derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment , 1991, Proteins.

[8]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Position-based sequence weights. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Ian B. Jeffery,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of methods for generating differentially expressed gene lists from microarray data , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Average core structures and variability measures for protein families: application to the immunoglobulins. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  B. Erman,et al.  Information‐theoretical entropy as a measure of sequence variability , 1991, Proteins.

[12]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  J. Thornton,et al.  Protein–protein interfaces: Analysis of amino acid conservation in homodimers , 2001, Proteins.

[14]  Kai Wang,et al.  Incorporating background frequency improves entropy-based residue conservation measures , 2006, BMC Bioinform..

[15]  R. Ranganathan,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. , 1999, Science.

[16]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  N. Ben-Tal,et al.  Comparison of site-specific rate-inference methods for protein sequences: empirical Bayesian methods are superior. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  R. Russell,et al.  Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  T. T. Wu,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE SEQUENCES OF THE VARIABLE REGIONS OF BENCE JONES PROTEINS AND MYELOMA LIGHT CHAINS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR ANTIBODY COMPLEMENTARITY , 1970, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[20]  R. M. Williamson.  Information theory analysis of the relationship between primary sequence structure and ligand recognition among a class of facilitated transporters. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  William R. Taylor,et al.  The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences , 1992, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[22]  W. Taylor,et al.  The classification of amino acid conservation. , 1986, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  X.-S. Liu,et al.  Robustness of the residue conservation score reflecting both frequencies and physicochemistries , 2008, Amino Acids.

[24]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Daniel R. Caffrey,et al.  Are protein–protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  W. S. Valdar,et al.  Scoring residue conservation , 2002, Proteins.

[27]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[28]  N. Ben-Tal,et al.  ConSurf: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Olivier Lichtarge,et al.  Background frequencies for residue variability estimates: BLOSUM revisited , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[30]  Jimin Pei,et al.  AL2CO: calculation of positional conservation in a protein sequence alignment , 2001, Bioinform..

[31]  Fredrik Johansson,et al.  Relative von Neumann Entropy for Evaluating amino acid conservation , 2010, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[32]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  S. Karlin,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of RecA genes in relation to protein structure and function , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[34]  Martin Vingron,et al.  A fast and sensitive multiple sequence alignment algorithm , 1989, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[35]  Y.-M. Cheng,et al.  Estimating residue evolutionary conservation by introducing von Neumann entropy and a novel gap-treating approach , 2007, Amino Acids.

[36]  John P. Overington,et al.  HOMSTRAD: A database of protein structure alignments for homologous families , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[37]  D Fischer,et al.  Analysis of heregulin symmetry by weighted evolutionary tracing. , 1999, Protein engineering.