Segmentation of surface curvature using a photometric invariant

Gaussian curvature is an intrinsic local shape characteristic of a smooth object surface that is invariant to orientation of the object in 3-D space and viewpoint. Accurate determination of the sign of Gaussian curvature at each point on a smooth object surface (i.e., the identification of hyperbolic, elliptical and parabolic points) can provide very important information for both recognition of objects in automated vision tasks and manipulation of objects by a robot. We present a multiple illumination technique that directly identifies elliptical, hyperbolic, and parabolic points from diffuse reflection from a smooth object surface. This technique is based upon a photometric invariant involving the behavior of the image intensity gradient under varying illumination. The nature of this photometric invariant allows direct segmentation of a smooth object surface according to the sign of Gaussian curvature independent of knowledge of local surface orientation, independent of diffuse surface albedo, and with only approximate knowledge of the geometry of multiple incident illumination. In comparison with photometric stereo, this new technique determines the sign of Gaussian curvature directly from image features without having to derive local surface orientation, is invariant to incident orientation errors of two of three light sources, and is invariant to the relative strength of incident radiance with respect to each of these light sources. We demonstrate how this segmentation technique works under conditions of simulated image noise, and actual experimental imaging results.<<ETX>>

[1]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Photometric Invariants Related to Solid Shape , 1980 .

[2]  L. B. Wolff Diffuse-reflectance model for smooth dielectric surfaces , 1994 .

[3]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Surface descriptions from stereo and shading , 1986, Image Vis. Comput..

[4]  R.J. Woodham,et al.  Determining surface curvature with photometric stereo , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Describing surfaces , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[6]  Lawrence B. Wolff Diffuse reflection (intensity reflectance model) , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  David A. Forsyth,et al.  Reflections on Shading , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Andrew Blake,et al.  The information available to a moving observer from specularities , 1989, Image Vis. Comput..

[9]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Geometry From Specularities , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] Second International Conference on Computer Vision.

[10]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Specular Stereo , 1985, IJCAI.

[11]  Robert J. Woodham,et al.  Photometric method for determining surface orientation from multiple images , 1980 .

[12]  A.L Yuille,et al.  Zero crossings on lines of curvature , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[13]  M. Pinar Mengüç,et al.  Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer , 2020 .

[14]  H. Piaggio Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces , 1952, Nature.

[15]  Berthold K. P. Horn Understanding Image Intensities , 1977, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Lawrence B. Wolff A photometric invariant and shape constraints at parabolic points , 1990, [1990] Proceedings Third International Conference on Computer Vision.

[17]  B K Horn,et al.  Calculating the reflectance map. , 1979, Applied optics.

[18]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Shape from shading , 1989 .

[19]  Thomas O. Binford,et al.  Local shape from specularity , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[20]  Ramesh C. Jain,et al.  Invariant surface characteristics for 3D object recognition in range images , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[21]  Robert J. Woodham,et al.  Analysing Images of Curved Surfaces , 1981, Artif. Intell..