Spontaneous activity in the perinatal trigeminal nucleus of the rat.

The role of electrical activity in establishing appropriate connections in the trigeminal pathway remains controversial. We report here a novel observation of spontaneous activity in the perinatal trigeminal sensory nucleus between embryonic day (E) 16 to postnatal day (P) 8. Most of these spontaneous bursts had the same polarity and were of comparable amplitude to the trigeminal nerve-evoked response. This synchronized activity was abolished by bicuculline or kynurenic acid. Recording from the teased trigeminal root during the spontaneous bursts also showed a corresponding afferent depolarization. We speculate that the GABAergic depolarization of pre- and postsynaptic cells may contribute to the generation of the spontaneous activity and its propagation throughout the trigeminal sensory pathway, even in the absence of activity initiated from peripheral sensory receptors.

[1]  R. Levy,et al.  The role of gaba in primary afferent depolarization , 1977, Progress in Neurobiology.

[2]  L. Maffei,et al.  Correlation in the discharges of neighboring rat retinal ganglion cells during prenatal life. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  M F Jacquin,et al.  Infraorbital nerve blockade from birth does not disrupt central trigeminal pattern formation in the rat. , 1992, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[4]  P. Rudomín.  Segmental and descending control of the synaptic effectiveness of muscle afferents. , 1994, Progress in brain research.

[5]  H. Killackey,et al.  Early ingrowth of thalamocortical afferents to the neocortex of the prenatal rat. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Rhythmic antidromic discharges of single primary afferents recorded in cut dorsal root filaments during locomotion in the cat , 1985, Brain Research.

[7]  C. Shatz.  Impulse activity and the patterning of connections during cns development , 1990, Neuron.

[8]  R. Rhoades,et al.  Prenatal development of the receptive fields of individual trigeminal ganglion cells in the rat. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  R. Wong,et al.  Age-Dependent and Cell Class-Specific Modulation of Retinal Ganglion Cell Bursting Activity by GABA , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  O. Garaschuk,et al.  Developmental profile and synaptic origin of early network oscillations in the CA1 region of rat neonatal hippocampus , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  M. Fitzgerald.  Spontaneous and evoked activity of fetal primary afferents in vivo , 1987, Nature.

[12]  H. Killackey,et al.  The development of vibrissae representation in subcortical trigeminal centers of the neonatal rat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  M. Kogo,et al.  Rhythmical oral-motor activity recorded in an in vitro brainstem preparation. , 1996, Somatosensory & motor research.

[14]  C. Leamey,et al.  Afferent arrival and onset of functional activity in the trigeminothalamic pathway of the rat. , 1998, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[15]  S. Jhaveri,et al.  Trigeminal ganglion cell processes are spatially ordered prior to the differentiation of the vibrissa pad , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Avery,et al.  Primary afferent depolarization: direct evidence in the trigeminal system. , 1974, Brain research.