Kalman Filter Based Estimation of Auditory Steady State Response Parameters

Auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) are brain responses to modulated or repetitive stimuli that can be captured in the EEG recording. ASSRs can be used as an objective measure to clinically determine frequency specific hearing thresholds, to quantify the sensitivity of the auditory system to modulation, and have been related to speech intelligibility. However, the detection of ASSRs is difficult due to the low signal to noise ratio of the responses. Moreover, minimizing measurement time is important for clinical applications. Traditionally ASSRs are analyzed using discrete Fourier transform (DFT) based methods. We present a Kalman filter based ASSR analysis procedure and illustrate several benefits over traditional DFT based methods. We show on a data set of 320 measurements that the proposed method reaches valid amplitude estimates significantly faster than the state of the art DFT method. Further, we provide two extensions to the proposed method. First, we demonstrate information can be incorporated from multiple recording electrodes by extending the system model. Secondly, we extend the model to incorporate artifacts from cochlear implant (CI) stimulation and demonstrate electrically evoked auditory steady state responses (EASSRs) can be accurately measured.

[1]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Auditory Steady State Cortical Responses Indicate Deviant Phonemic-Rate Processing in Adults With Dyslexia , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[2]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetry in Auditory Processing of Speech Envelope Modulations in Prereading Children , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  C. Striebel,et al.  On the maximum likelihood estimates for linear dynamic systems , 1965 .

[4]  W. T. Nelson,et al.  Vigilance , 2013, Royal Society of Health journal.

[5]  Shin'ichiro Kanoh,et al.  A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System Based on Auditory Stream Segregation , 2010 .

[6]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Improved Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady-State Response Thresholds in Humans , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[7]  G M Clark,et al.  The Automated Prediction of Hearing Thresholds in Sleeping Subjects Using Auditory Steady‐State Evoked Potentials , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[8]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[10]  T W Picton,et al.  Reliability estimates for steady-state evoked potentials. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  B. Oken,et al.  Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and measurement , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Assessing temporal modulation sensitivity using electrically evoked auditory steady state responses , 2015, Hearing Research.

[13]  R. Cardoso,et al.  Comparative analysis between FFT and Kalman filter approaches for harmonic components detection , 2012, 2012 10th IEEE/IAS International Conference on Industry Applications.

[14]  Adly Girgis,et al.  Application of Kalman Filtering in Computer Relaying , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[15]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Objective assessment of frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies. , 2004, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[16]  Yong Li,et al.  Practical Approaches to Kalman Filtering with Time-Correlated Measurement Errors , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[17]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[18]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady State Responses in Cochlear Implant Users , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[19]  Hari M. Bharadwaj,et al.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  C Pantev,et al.  A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R. Burkard Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 2010 .

[22]  Alain de Cheveigné,et al.  Sensor noise suppression , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Terence W Picton,et al.  Auditory Steady-State Responses and Word Recognition Scores in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Adults , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[24]  Ah Chung Tsoi,et al.  A Kalman filtering approach to short-time Fourier analysis , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[25]  Petros G. Voulgaris,et al.  On optimal ℓ∞ to ℓ∞ filtering , 1995, Autom..

[26]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Denoising based on spatial filtering , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .