Individual prefabricated titanium implants and titanium mesh in skull base reconstructive surgery. A report of cases

Titanium implants can be shaped by traditional hand forming, press shaping, modular construction by welding, construction on full-size models shaped from CT coordinates and, most recently, by computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) that consist in the direct prefabrication of individual implants by milling them out of a solid block of titanium. The aim of our study was to present a set of preliminary cases of an ongoing program of reconstructive procedures of the skull base using titanium implants. The subjects underwent ablative procedures of the skull base with reconstruction either by titanium mesh or individual prefabricated CAD/CAM implants. Six patients have been operated on successfully since 2000: two received prefabricated CAD/CAM titanium plates and four others underwent reconstruction with titanium mesh. The stability of CAD/CAM plates is superior to that of mesh, thus it is more useful in reconstructing large lesions of the frontal skull base and the temporal and occipital bones. Titanium mesh was successfully used for defects smaller than 100 cm2 or where selected viscerocranial defects are complicated in design and less reproducible by CAD/CAM. The intraoperative design, shaping and adjustment characteristic of titanium mesh can be dispensed with when CAD/CAM implants are used. The 3-D data set used in the CAD/CAM process also operates in the navigated simulation and planning of the ablation contours, the latter being of great assistance in establishing the optimal future defect. As a disadvantage, CAD/CAM technology is more expensive than titanium mesh, and the process is time-consuming as it is carried out in advance of surgery.

[1]  R. Laszig,et al.  Komplikationen der endonasalen Nebenhöhlenchirurgie - diagnostische und therapeutische Konsequenzen* , 1998 .

[2]  Warren Schubert,et al.  Safety of titanium mesh for orbital reconstruction. , 2002, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  H Eufinger,et al.  CAD by processing of computed tomography data and CAM of individually designed prostheses. , 1995, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  H Eufinger,et al.  Individual Prefabricated Titanium Implants in Reconstructive Craniofacial Surgery: Clinical and Technical Aspects of the First 22 Cases , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Computer‐Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT‐Based Models , 1986, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  F W Zonneveld A decade of clinical three-dimensional imaging: a review. Part III. Image analysis and interaction, display options, and physical models. , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[7]  J. Lambrecht,et al.  Individual Skull Model Fabrication for Craniofacial Surgery , 1990 .

[8]  A. Harders,et al.  Reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects with individual alloplastic implants based on CAD/CAM-manipulated CT-data. , 1995, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[9]  A Linney,et al.  A prospective study of computer-aided design and manufacture of titanium plate for cranioplasty and its clinical outcome. , 1999, British journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  F W Zonneveld,et al.  Single-step fronto-orbital resection and reconstruction with individual resection template and corresponding titanium implant: a new method of computer-aided surgery. , 1998, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[11]  M. Kuriakose,et al.  Titanium mesh in orbital wall reconstruction. , 1992, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  M. Macfarlane,et al.  Titanium in reconstructive surgery of the skull and face. , 1990, British journal of plastic surgery.

[13]  A. Dacho,et al.  [Orbital floor reconstruction. Comparison of a new perforated 0.15 mm thick PDS layer with established titanium dynamic mesh]. , 2002, HNO.

[14]  L. Hollier,et al.  Classification and Surgical Management of Orbital Fractures: Experience With 111 Orbital Reconstructions , 2002, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[15]  B. Badie,et al.  Use of titanium mesh for reconstruction of large anterior cranial base defects. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  L. Zouloumis,et al.  The use of titanium mesh sheet in the fronto-zygomatico-orbital region. Case reports. , 1998, Australian dental journal.

[17]  R. Laszig,et al.  [Complications of endonasal paranasal sinus surgery--diagnostic and therapeutic consequences]. , 1998, Laryngo- rhino- otologie.