Eyesores in sight: Quantifying the impact of man-made elements on the scenic beauty of Dutch landscapes

The numerous man-made elements being introduced into the countryside raises the question of how negative impacts on scenic beauty can be minimized. This study investigates the visual impact of wind turbines, business parks and agricultural buildings (barns) on scenic beauty, taking into account their context, design, distance from the observer and mitigating measures. Participants (N = 2008) were members of a commercial research agency panel. In a web-based survey, they were shown 36 photographs of undisturbed landscapes interspersed with realistic photomontages of landscapes with one of the three elements. Participants rated the scenic beauty of the landscapes in random order. Wind turbines had a clear negative impact in all cases, with design factors and mitigating measures making little or no difference. The impact of turbines decreased somewhat with distance and was greater in landscapes that were evaluated as more beautiful in their original (undisturbed) state. The impact of business parks and barns was somewhat dependent on (some) design factors and mitigating vegetation, which occasionally resulted in no significant impact at all. Distance also clearly affected impact. Systematic individual differences were observed only for wind turbines: impact increased with age. Main conclusions are that for wind turbines location policy would seem most effective for minimizing impact, whereas for business parks and barns a lot can be achieved by design and especially mitigation. The impact of wind turbines might diminish over time anyway, due to increased familiarity. Finally, the relationship between impact on scenic beauty and social acceptance of man-made elements is briefly discussed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1]  R. L. Horton.  The General Linear Model: Data Analysis in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. , 1987 .

[2]  J. F. Coeterier,et al.  Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape , 1996 .

[3]  Simon Bell,et al.  Elements of Visual Design in the Landscape , 1993 .

[4]  R. Millward,et al.  The Experience of Landscape , 1988 .

[5]  Frits van den Berg,et al.  Can road traffic mask sound from wind turbines? Response to wind turbine sound at different levels of road traffic sound. , 2010 .

[6]  G. Fry,et al.  Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Tiziano Tempesta,et al.  The perception of agrarian historical landscapes: A study of the Veneto plain in Italy , 2010 .

[8]  Andrew Lothian,et al.  Scenic Perceptions of the Visual Effects of Wind Farms on South Australian Landscapes , 2008 .

[9]  Michael Roth,et al.  Validating the use of internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessment : An empirical study from Germany , 2006 .

[10]  Gordon A. Bradley,et al.  Public perception as support for scenic quality regulation in a nationally treasured landscape , 2008 .

[11]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[12]  Maria Johansson,et al.  Intention to respond to local wind turbines: the role of attitudes and visual perception , 2007 .

[13]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Visual assessment of off-shore wind turbines: The influence of distance, contrast, movement and social variables , 2007 .

[14]  R. Sebba.  The Landscapes of Childhood , 1991 .

[15]  Robert L. Thayer,et al.  Altamont: Public perceptions of a wind energy landscape , 1987 .

[16]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Evaluation of Landscape Change by Different Social Groups , 2008 .

[17]  Francisco Ayuga,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF THE VISUAL IMPACT MADE ON THE LANDSCAPE BY NEW BUILDINGS: A METHODOLOGY FOR SITE SELECTION , 2004 .

[18]  Bernd Möller,et al.  Emerging and fading wind energy landscapes in Denmark , 2010 .

[19]  J. Roos,et al.  Mapping the attractiveness of the Dutch countryside: a GIS-based landscape appreciation model , 2007 .

[20]  Víctor-Andrés Cloquell-Ballester,et al.  Development and validation of a multicriteria indicator for the assessment of objective aesthetic impact of wind farms , 2009 .

[21]  G. Fry,et al.  The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  J. F. Coeterier,et al.  GROUP DIFFERENCES IN THE AESTHETIC EVALUATION OF NATURE DEVELOPMENT PLANS: A MULTILEVEL APPROACH , 1998 .

[23]  J. Palmer.  Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts , 2004 .

[24]  B. Pedroli,et al.  From Hiking Through Farmland to Farming in a Leisure Landscape: Changing Social Perceptions of the European Landscape , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland , 2010 .

[26]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Prediction of scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems , 1994 .

[27]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study , 2009 .

[28]  Norberto Fueyo,et al.  A method for the assessment of the visual impact caused by the large-scale deployment of renewable-energy facilities , 2010 .

[29]  Juan M. Domingo-Santos,et al.  The visual exposure in forest and rural landscapes: An algorithm and a GIS tool , 2011 .

[30]  A. Buijs,et al.  No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences , 2009 .

[31]  T. Daniel.  Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century , 2001 .

[32]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Cognition and Environment: Function - ing in an Uncertain World , 1983 .

[33]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Determination of Thresholds of Visual Impact: The Case of Wind Turbines , 2002 .

[34]  Theocharis Tsoutsos,et al.  Visual impact evaluation of a wind park in a Greek island , 2009 .

[35]  Alicia Montarzino,et al.  The Childhood Factor , 2008 .

[36]  Yoji Aoki.  Review article: trends in the study of the psychological evaluation of landscape , 1999 .

[37]  Ke-Tsung Han.  An Exploration of Relationships Among the Responses to Natural Scenes , 2010 .

[38]  Åsa Ode,et al.  Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character , 2006 .

[39]  Constantino Arce,et al.  CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPES USING QUANTITATIVE AND CATEGORICAL DATA, AND PREDICTION OF THEIR SCENIC BEAUTY IN NORTH-WESTERN SPAIN , 2000 .