The use of magnetic resonance angiography in stereotactic neurosurgery.

The authors discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the use of magnetic resonance (MR) angiography images in stereotactic neurosurgery. Current computer programs designed to assist the neurosurgeon in the planning of stereotactic neurosurgical interventions use intraarterial digital subtraction angiography images to visualize the blood vessels. Magnetic resonance angiography is a recent technique with a number of advantages over the digital subtraction method: it is less invasive and less prone to complications; it provides truly three-dimensional data sets that can be viewed from any direction; and it can visualize both stationary and flowing tissues with the same imaging device and localizer frame. Although digital subtraction images are still superior in contrast and vascular detail, state-of-the-art high-resolution MR angiography sequences provide sufficient vascular detail for planning surgery. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography images were acquired using adapted gradient-echo sequences to compensate for flow-induced distortions; postacquisition distortion correction was not necessary. Five methods to integrate and inspect a possible trajectory in the MR angiography data are discussed. Initial clinical experience with eight patients led to the conclusion that MR angiography is a valuable imaging modality that can be integrated reliably into a stereotactic neurosurgery planning procedure.

[1]  C. Wilson,et al.  Multimodality imaging of brain structures for stereotactic surgery. , 1990, Radiology.

[2]  G. Marchal,et al.  On the problem of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance images for stereotactic neurosurgery. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  J. Hajnal,et al.  Design and implementation of magnetization transfer pulse sequences for clinical use. , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Computer assisted stereotactic neurosurgery , 1993, Image Vis. Comput..

[5]  C Mistretta,et al.  Treatment of arteriovenous malformations with stereotactic radiosurgery employing both magnetic resonance angiography and standard angiography as a database. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J. Michiels,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRA of the brain. , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  A L Baert,et al.  Intracranial vascular lesions: optimization and clinical evaluation of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. , 1990, Radiology.

[8]  V Sturm,et al.  Correction of spatial distortion in MR imaging: a prerequisite for accurate stereotaxy. , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  G Laub,et al.  Displays for MR angiography , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  E M Haacke,et al.  Optimizing blood vessel contrast in fast three‐dimensional MRI , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  D G Nishimura,et al.  On the nature and reduction of the displacement artifact in flow images , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Correction of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance angiography for radiosurgical treatment planning of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  L R Schad,et al.  Use of MR angiography for stereotactic planning. , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  G Marchal,et al.  A prototype medical workstation for computer-assisted stereotactic neurosurgery. , 1990, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[15]  T. Peters,et al.  Integrated stereotaxic imaging with CT, MR imaging, and digital subtraction angiography. , 1986, Radiology.