Dynamics of hemispheric activity during metaphor comprehension: Electrophysiological measures

Brain imaging studies have lead to conflicting findings regarding the involvement of the right hemisphere (RH) in metaphor comprehension. Some report more relative RH activation when processing figurative expressions but others have shown just the opposite. The inconsistencies might be a result of the low temporal resolution related to current brain imaging techniques which is insufficient to uncover patterns of hemispheric interaction that change over time. Event-related potentials and a source estimation technique (LORETA) were used to investigate such temporal interactions when processing two-word expressions denoting literal, conventional metaphoric, and novel metaphoric meaning, as well as unrelated word pairs. Participants performed a semantic judgment task in which they decided whether each word pair conveyed a meaningful expression. Our findings indicate that during comprehension of novel metaphors there are some stages of considerable RH involvement, mainly of the temporal and superior frontal areas. Although the processing mechanisms used for all types of expressions were similar and require both hemispheres, the relative contribution of each hemisphere at specific processing stages depended on stimulus type. Those stages correspond roughly to the N400 and LPC components which reflect semantic and contextual integration, respectively. The present study demonstrates that RH mechanisms are necessary, but not sufficient, for understanding metaphoric expressions. Both hemispheres work in concert in a complex dynamical pattern during literal and figurative language comprehension. Electrophysiological recordings together with source localization algorithms such as LORETA are a viable tool for measuring this type of activity patterns.

[1]  J. Pynte,et al.  The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1996, Brain and Language.

[2]  D. Zaidel,et al.  The Interpretation of Sentence Ambiguity in Patients with Unilateral Focal Brain Surgery , 1995, Brain and Language.

[3]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Brain Potentials during Memory Retrieval Provide Neurophysiological Support for the Distinction between Conscious Recollection and Priming , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Erb,et al.  Neural correlates of metaphor processing. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  M. Dapretto,et al.  Making sense during conversation: an fMRI study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[7]  A. Friederici,et al.  Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Christine Passerieux,et al.  ERPs of metaphoric, literal, and incongruous semantic processing in schizophrenia. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[9]  T. Hendler,et al.  An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions , 2007, Brain and Language.

[10]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Processing of metaphoric and non-metaphoric alternative meanings of words after right- and left-hemispheric lesion , 2003, Brain and Language.

[11]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes , 2007, Brain and Language.

[12]  R. Pascual-Marqui Review of methods for solving the EEG inverse problem , 1999 .

[13]  B. Abbott,et al.  The Psychology of Word Meanings. , 1992 .

[14]  H. Pratt,et al.  High-resolution time course of hemispheric dominance revealed by low-resolution electromagnetic tomography , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Faust,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphorsfn2 fn2 This research was part of the M.A. thesis of the first author at Bar-Ilan University under the supervision of the second author. , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  D. Gentner Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[17]  M. Just,et al.  Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[19]  C. Burgess,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.

[20]  T. Hendler,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in processing nonsalient metaphorical meanings: Application of Principal Components Analysis to fMRI data , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Functional imaging with low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) : review, new comparisons, and new validation , 2002 .

[23]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[24]  A. Kasher,et al.  Effects of Right and Left Hemisphere Damage on Performance of the “Right Hemisphere Communication Battery” , 2002, Brain and Language.

[25]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[26]  Pierre Ingrand,et al.  Metaphorical and non-metaphorical links: a behavioral and ERP study in young and elderly adults , 2002, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  C. Petten,et al.  Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[28]  A. Schweiger,et al.  Processing of lexical ambiguity in patients with traumatic brain injury , 1998, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[29]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[30]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  Semantically convergent and semantically divergent priming in the cerebral hemispheres: lexical decision and semantic judgment. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[32]  Mirella Dapretto,et al.  Metaphorical vs. literal word meanings: fMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere , 2006, NeuroImage.

[33]  Michael J. Brammer,et al.  How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: The role of the right frontal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the recollection of low and high frequency words , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Brian F. Bowdle,et al.  The career of metaphor. , 2005, Psychological review.

[37]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[38]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese , 2007, Brain and Language.

[39]  S. Molholm,et al.  Novel Metaphors Appear Anomalous at Least Momentarily: Evidence from N400 , 2002, Brain and Language.

[40]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  A. Friederici The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[42]  J. Hinojosa,et al.  Neural activity associated with metaphor comprehension: spatial analysis , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[43]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[45]  M. Faust,et al.  Sentence priming effects in the two cerebral hemispheres: influences of lexical relatedness, word order, and sentence anomaly , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  Michael J. Brammer,et al.  Deriving meaning: Distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-meaningful sentences , 2007, Brain and Language.

[47]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[48]  R. Giora Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis , 1997 .

[49]  Michael Erb,et al.  Laterality in metaphor processing: Lack of evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging for the right hemisphere theory , 2007, Brain and Language.

[50]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[51]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Sensitivity to lexical denotation and connotation in brain-damaged patients: A double dissociation? , 1984, Brain and Language.