Understanding conditional promises and threats

Conditional promises and threats are speech acts that are used to manipulate other people's behaviour. Studies on human reasoning typically use propositional logic to analyse what people infer from such inducements. While this approach is sufficient to uncover conceptual features of inducements, it fails to explain them. To overcome this limitation, we propose a multilevel analysis integrating motivational, linguistic, deontic, behavioural, and emotional aspects. Commonalities and differences between conditional promises and threats on various levels were examined in two experiments. The first shows that both types of inducements are understood as being complementary on the linguistic level, but not reversible, due to the specific temporal order of their actions. In addition, it gives a first assessment of emotional reactions. The second experiment investigated the novel question of whether complementary promises and threats, despite semantic differences, both imply an obligation to cooperate on the deontic level. The data corroborate this hypothesis, and they support various appraisal-theoretical assumptions on the elicitation of emotions. They also reveal that content affects not only the attribution of emotions, but also the deontic interpretation.

[1]  H. Spada,et al.  Evaluation of environmental problems: A coherence model of cognition and emotion , 2001 .

[2]  Hans Spada,et al.  The logic of content effects in propositional reasoning: The case of conditional reasoning with a point of view , 2003 .

[3]  V. Thompson,et al.  Everyday reasoning with inducements and advice , 2004 .

[4]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Human Reasoning: The Psychology Of Deduction , 1993 .

[5]  Roy J. Lewicki,et al.  A Three‐Factor Experimental Analysis of Promises and Threats , 1973 .

[6]  Ira J. Roseman.  Appraisal Determinants of Emotions: Constructing a More Accurate and Comprehensive Theory , 1996 .

[7]  The Pragmatics of Promise , 1997, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence.

[8]  Sieghard Beller,et al.  The Flexible Use of Deontic Mental Models , 2003 .

[9]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Sieghard Beller,et al.  Conditional Promises and Threats – Cognition and Emotion , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[11]  Sieghard Beller,et al.  A Model Theory of Deontic Reasoning About Social Norms - eScholarship , 2001 .

[12]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings , 1988 .

[13]  Patricia W. Cheng,et al.  Pragmatic Reasoning With a Point of View , 1995 .

[14]  Samuel Fillenbaum,et al.  On Conditionals: THE USE OF CONDITIONALS IN INDUCEMENTS AND DETERRENTS , 1986 .

[15]  L. Cosmides.  The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task , 1989, Cognition.

[16]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[17]  K. Scherer.  Profiles of Emotion-antecedent Appraisal: Testing Theoretical Predictions across Cultures , 1997 .

[18]  S. Freedman.  Threats, Promises, and Coalitions: A Study of Compliance and Retaliation in a Simulated Organizational Setting1 , 1981 .

[19]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part II: Case study: A computational theory of social exchange , 1989 .

[20]  S. Fillenbaum.  A Condition on Plausible Inducements , 1977, Language and speech.

[21]  John J. Kennedy.  Analyzing qualitative data : log-linear analysis for behavioral research , 1992 .

[22]  Michael L. Geis,et al.  On Invited Inferences , 1971 .

[23]  M. Heilman,et al.  Counteracting the boomerang: The effects of choice on compliance to threats and promises. , 1975 .

[24]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  S. Newstead.  Conditional Reasoning with Realistic Material , 1997 .

[26]  L. Cosmides,et al.  No interpretation without representation: the role of domain-specific representations and inferences in the Wason selection task , 2000, Cognition.

[27]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. , 2002, Psychological review.

[28]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Threats and Promises: Reputational Consequences and Transfer of Credibility. , 1974 .

[29]  G. Politzer,et al.  Reasoning about Conditional Promises and Warnings: Darwinian Algorithms, Mental Models, Relevance Judgements or Pragmatic Schemas? , 1992 .

[30]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Conditional reasoning with inducements and advice , 1998, Cognition.

[31]  D. Cicchetti.  Emotion and Adaptation , 1993 .

[32]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Reasoning with Realistic Disjunctives , 1984 .

[33]  Sieghard Beller,et al.  Cultural Differences in the Cognition and Emotion of Conditional Promises and Threats – Comparing Germany and Tonga , 2004 .

[34]  Pragmatic Reasoning Schemas for Conditional Promises: Context and Representation , 1990 .

[35]  P. Thagard,et al.  Emotional Gestalts: Appraisal, Change, and the Dynamics of Affect , 2002 .

[36]  J. Searle.  Rationality in Action , 2001 .

[37]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change , 1992, Cognition.