Collagen fibril surface: TMAFM, FEG‐SEM and freeze‐etching observations

Native, unfixed collagen fibrils from rat tail tendon were dehydrated following different procedures and observed under a FEG‐SEM and an AFM operated in Tapping Mode (TMAFM). Freeze‐etched, untreated fibrils from the same tissue were also observed for comparison. The most notable features of the fibril surface, i.e., the gap/overlap alternation and three prominent intraperiod ridges, were simultaneously visible only in freeze‐etched specimens, while under the SEM and the TMAFM their appearance was dependent on both the dehydration procedure and the visualization technique. The different susceptibility of the collagen fibril surface structures to various treatments clearly implies the existence of domains of different composition. Moreover, identical specimens were imaged differently by SEM and TMAFM, highlighting instrument‐specific advantages and limitations. The onset of dehydration‐dependent, procedure‐specific artifacts should be considered in high‐resolution studies of connective tissues. As for any biological specimen, the final aspect of collagen fibrils is determined no less by the preliminary treatments than by the visualization approach. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  F. Reinholt,et al.  Fibromodulin distribution and association with collagen. , 1994, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[2]  F. Sommer,et al.  Atomic force microscopy study of the collagen fibre structure , 1994, Biology of the cell.

[3]  J. Revel,et al.  Subfibrillar structure of type I collagen observed by atomic force microscopy. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[4]  C. Dell'orbo,et al.  Scanning electron microscopy of rat tail tendon collagen , 1992, Microscopy research and technique.

[5]  O. Ohtani The maceration technique in scanning electron microscopy of collagen fiber frameworks: its application in the study of human livers. , 1992, Archives of histology and cytology.

[6]  B. Font,et al.  Structure and function of the fibril-associated collagens. , 1991, Biochemical Society transactions.

[7]  M. E. van der Rest,et al.  Collagen family of proteins , 1991, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[8]  M. Raspanti,et al.  Collagen fibril surface structures: freeze-etching data and computer modelling. , 1989, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[9]  T. Inoué,et al.  A new drying method of biological specimens for scanning electron microscopy: the t-butyl alcohol freeze-drying method. , 1988, Archives of histology and cytology.

[10]  M. Morocutti,et al.  Differences in the fibril structure of corneal and tendon collagen. An electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction investigation. , 1986, Connective tissue research.

[11]  J. Scott,et al.  ‘Small’-proteoglycan: collagen interactions: Keratan sulphate proteoglycan associates with rabbit corneal collagen fibrils at the ‘a’ and ‘c’ bands , 1985, Bioscience reports.

[12]  J. Scott,et al.  Proteoglycan-type I collagen fibril interactions in bone and non-calcifying connective tissues , 1985, Bioscience reports.

[13]  A. Ruggeri,et al.  Ultrastructural aspects of freeze-etched collagen fibrils , 1984 .

[14]  J. Scott,et al.  Dermatan sulphate-rich proteoglycan associates with rat tail-tendon collagen at the d band in the gap region. , 1981, The Biochemical journal.

[15]  K. Hashimoto Ultrastructure of freeze-cleaved dermal collagen. , 1974, Acta dermato-venereologica.