Impact of organic pig production systems on CO2 emission, C sequestration and nitrate pollution

Organic rules for grazing and access to outdoor areas in pig production may be met in different ways, which express compromises between considerations for animal welfare, feed self-reliance and negative environmental impact such as greenhouse gas emissions and nitrate pollution. This article compares the environmental impact of the main organic pig systems in Denmark. Normally, sows are kept in huts on grassland and finishing pigs are raised in stables with access to an outdoor run. One alternative practice is also rearing the fattening pigs on grassland all year round. The third method investigated was a one-unit pen system mainly consisting of a deep litter area under a climate tent and with restricted access to a grazing area. Using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, the emissions of greenhouse gases of the free range system were estimated to be 3.3 kg CO2-equivalents kg−1 live weight pig, which was significantly higher than the indoor fattening system and the tent system, yielding 2.9 and 2.8 kg CO2-eq. kg−1 pig, respectively. This was 7–22% higher compared with Danish conventional pig production but, due to the integration of grass-clover in the organic crop rotations these had an estimated net soil carbon sequestration. When carbon sequestration was included in the LCA then the organic systems had lower greenhouse gas emissions compared with conventional pig production. Eutrophication in nitrate equivalents per kg pig was 21–65% higher in the organic pig systems and acidification was 35–45% higher per kg organic pig compared with the conventional system. We conclude that, even though the free range system theoretically has agro-ecological advantages over the indoor fattening system and the tent system due to a larger grass-clover area, this potential is difficult to implement in practice due to problems with leaching on sandy soil. Only if forage can contribute to a larger proportion of the pigfeed uptake may the free range system be economically and environmentally competitive. Improvement of nitrogen cycling and efficiency is the most important factor for reducing the overall environmental load from organic pig meat. Presently, a system with pig fattening in stables and concrete-covered outdoor runs seems to be the best solution from an environmental point of view.

[1]  Karin Strudsholm.  Slagtekvalitet og sygdomsfund hos økologiske slagtesvin , 2004 .

[2]  S. Tamminga,et al.  Pollution due to nutrient losses and its control in European animal production , 2003 .

[3]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[4]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Implications of Uncertainty and Variability in the Life Cycle Assessment of Pig Production Systems(7 pp) , 2006 .

[5]  A. Chalmers,et al.  Nitrate leaching and residual soil nitrogen supply following outdoor pig farming , 2005 .

[6]  U. Sonesson,et al.  Sustainable Development of Food Production: A Case Study on Scenarios for Pig Production , 2005 .

[7]  R. Dalgaard.  The environmental impact of pork production from a life cycle perspective , 2007 .

[8]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Methodology, tools and case studies in product development , 2000 .

[9]  H. Søgaard,et al.  Ammonia volatilization from sows on grassland , 2001 .

[10]  Sam Millet,et al.  Performance, meat and carcass traits of fattening pigs with organic versus conventional housing and nutrition , 2004 .

[11]  H. Aarts,et al.  Nutrient management at farm scale: how to attain policy objectives in regions with intensive dairy farming: first workshop of the EGF Working Group 'Dairy farming systems and environment' Quimper, France, 23-25 June 2003 , 2005 .

[12]  S. C. Jarvis,et al.  Nutrient management legislation in European countries , 2001 .

[13]  H. M. G. Werf,et al.  The environmental impacts of the production of concentrated feed: the case of pig feed in Bretagne , 2005 .

[14]  A. Dégre,et al.  Conventional versus alternative pig production assessed by multicriteria decision analysis , 2007, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[15]  J. Hermansen,et al.  Performance and carcass quality of fully or partly outdoor reared pigs in organic production , 2005 .

[16]  J. Hermansen,et al.  Ecological Animal Husbandry in the Nordic Countries , 2002 .

[17]  N. Halberg,et al.  Nitrogen turnover on organic and conventional mixed farms , 1995 .

[18]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France , 2005 .

[19]  N. Halberg,et al.  Expected Crop Yield Loss When Converting to Organic Dairy Farming in Denmark , 1997 .

[20]  S. Stern,et al.  Performance, site preferences, foraging and excretory behaviour in relation to feed allowance of growing pigs on pasture , 2003 .

[21]  S. Hansen,et al.  Simulation of nitrogen dynamics and biomass production in winter wheat using the Danish simulation model DAISY , 1991, Fertilizer research.

[22]  Helena Elmquist,et al.  Environmental Systems Analysis of Pig Production - The Impact of Feed Choice (12 pp) , 2005 .

[23]  G. Haas,et al.  Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment , 2001 .

[24]  J. Hermansen,et al.  PRIMARY PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT | Meat Production in Organic Farming , 2004 .

[25]  I. D. Boer,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production , 2003 .

[26]  V. Lund,et al.  Organic pig production in Denmark. , 2000 .

[27]  Anònim Anònim.  Keys to Soil Taxonomy , 2010 .

[28]  Sustainable development of food production : a case study on scenarios for pig production , 2005 .

[29]  J. Eriksen,et al.  Denitrification losses from outdoor piglet production: spatial and temporal variability. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[30]  F. P. Vinther,et al.  SimDen - en simpel model til kvantificering af N2O-emission og denitrifikation. , 2004 .

[31]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Part II: Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment , 1998 .

[32]  N. Halberg,et al.  Modelling representative and coherent Danish farm types based on farm accountancy data for use in environmental assessments , 2006 .

[33]  A. Lüscher,et al.  Land use systems in grassland dominated regions. Proceedings of the 20th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Luzern, Switzerland, 21-24 June 2004. , 2004 .

[34]  J. Eriksen.  Implications of grazing by sows for nitrate leaching from grassland and the succeeding cereal crop , 2001 .

[35]  V. Lund,et al.  Sows on pasture. , 2000 .

[36]  H. B. Rom,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus consumption, utilisation and losses in pig production: Denmark , 1999 .

[37]  Jean Petit,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods , 2002 .

[38]  Kristian Kristensen,et al.  Potential loss of nutrients from different rearing strategies for fattening pigs on pasture , 2006 .

[39]  Helga Willer,et al.  Development of the Organic Market in Europe , 2010 .

[40]  B. Séve,et al.  Nitrogen consumption, utilization and losses in pig production , 1997 .

[41]  H.M.G. van der Werf,et al.  Methods and data for the environmental inventory of contrasting pig production systems , 2007 .

[42]  L. Svensson,et al.  Ammonia Emissions from Pigs on Deep Litter Beds and in a Strip Grazing System , 2003 .

[43]  B. J. Chambers,et al.  Nitrogen losses from outdoor pig farming systems , 2000 .

[44]  John E. Hermansen,et al.  Development of organic pic production systems , 2003 .

[45]  I. D. Boer,et al.  Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems , 2005 .

[46]  Claudine Basset-Mens,et al.  Implications of Uncertainty and Variability in the Life Cycle Assessment of Pig Farming Systems , 2004 .

[47]  Sven G. Sommer,et al.  The fate of nitrogen in outdoor pig production , 2002 .

[48]  J. E. Hermansen,et al.  Concept for ecological pig production in one-unit pens in twelve-sided climate tents. Design and layout. , 2000 .

[49]  J McGlade,et al.  The European Environment: State and Outlook 2005 , 2005 .

[50]  H. Poulsen,et al.  Phosphorus consumption, utilisation and losses in pig production in France, The Netherlands and Denmark , 1999 .

[51]  M. Calus,et al.  The association between somatic cell count patterns and milk production prior to mastitis , 2005 .