Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading

Firms design products that appeal to consumers and are feasible to produce. The resulting marketing and engineering design goals are driven by consumer preferences and engineering capabilities, two issues that conveniently are addressed in isolation from one another. This convenient isolation, however, typically will not result in optimal product decisions when the two problems are interrelated. A method new to the marketing community, analytical target cascading (ATC), is adopted here to explore such interrelationships and to formalize the process of coordinating marketing and engineering design problems in a way that is proven to yield the joint optimal solution. The ATC model is built atop well-established marketing methodologies, such as conjoint, discrete choice modeling and demand forecasting. The method is demonstrated in the design of dial-readout household scales, using real conjoint choice data and a parametric engineering product design model. Results indicate that the most profitable achievable product can fall short of predictions based on marketing alone but well ahead of what engineering may produce based on original marketing target specifications. A number of extensions can be accomplished readily using techniques from the extant marketing and design optimization literature.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[2]  D. Littler Design and Marketing of New Products , 1981 .

[3]  D. Wittink,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey , 1982 .

[4]  J. Hornik Situational Effects on the Consumption of Time , 1982 .

[5]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[6]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Model for Studying R&D–Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process , 1986 .

[7]  Alejandro R. Diaz Interactive solution to multiobjective optimization problems , 1987 .

[8]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation , 1988 .

[9]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making , 1988 .

[10]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis , 1988 .

[11]  W. Souder Managing relations between R&D and marketing in new product development projects☆ , 1988 .

[12]  Philippe Cattin,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update , 1989 .

[13]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[14]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  The R&D-marketing interface in Japanese high-technology firms , 1992 .

[15]  A. Griffin,et al.  Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing-A Comparison Between Two New Product Teams , 1992 .

[16]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: Results and critical reflections , 1994 .

[17]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[18]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[19]  V. Rao,et al.  Research for product positioning and design decisions: An integrative review , 1995 .

[20]  R. Hibbeler Statics and Mechanics of Materials , 1995 .

[21]  L. Gary,et al.  ABELL F. Dereck, Defining The Business. The Starting Point of Strategic Planning . USA, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1980. , 1996 .

[22]  A. Griffin The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time , 1997 .

[23]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 1997 .

[24]  David W. Beach,et al.  Integrated Product Design for Marketability and Manufacturing , 1997 .

[25]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Editorial: Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 1997 .

[26]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design , 1998 .

[27]  Kirthi Kalyanam,et al.  Estimating Irregular Pricing Effects: A Stochastic Spline Regression Approach , 1998 .

[28]  F. Jovane,et al.  Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems , 1999 .

[29]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Contingency Value of Complementary Capabilities in Product Development , 1999 .

[30]  Marinus Egbert Haaijer,et al.  Modeling conjoint choice experiments with the probit model , 1999 .

[31]  H. Li,et al.  Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[32]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Target Cascading in Optimal System Design , 2003, DAC 2000.

[33]  J. Hauser Metrics Thermostat , 2000 .

[34]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[35]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Agent-Based Synthesis of Electromechanical Design Configurations , 2000 .

[36]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Launch decisions and new product success: an empirical comparison of consumer and industrial products , 2000 .

[37]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Platform driven development of product families: Linking theory with practice , 2001 .

[38]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Analytical Target Cascading in Automotive Vehicle Design , 2001 .

[39]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[40]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Integrating Market Research With the Product Development Process: A Step Towards Design for Profit , 2001 .

[41]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products , 2001 .

[43]  John R. Hauser,et al.  ArticleMetrics thermostat ☆11 , 2001 .

[44]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  Erim Report Series Research in Management the Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R & D Bibliographic Data and Classifications , 2022 .

[45]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Target cascading in vehicle redesign: a class VI truck study , 2002 .

[46]  Xiaoyu Gu,et al.  Decision-Based Collaborative Optimization , 2002 .

[47]  Rick L. Andrews,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Logit Choice Models with Discrete versus Continuous Representations of Heterogeneity , 2002 .

[48]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[49]  Rick L. Andrews,et al.  Hierarchical Bayes versus Finite Mixture Conjoint Analysis Models: A Comparison of Fit, Prediction, and Partworth Recovery , 2002 .

[50]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Convergence properties of analytical target cascading , 2002 .

[51]  Kenneth B. Kahn An exploratory investigation of new product forecasting practices , 2002 .

[52]  William L. Moore,et al.  A Comparison of Quality Function Deployment and Conjoint Analysis in New Product Design , 2002 .

[53]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1007/s00158-002-0240-0 , 2022 .

[54]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A RIGOROUS FRAMEWORK FOR MAKING COMMONALITY AND MODULARITY DECISIONS IN OPTIMAL DESIGN OF PRODUCT FAMILIES , 2003 .

[55]  Panayotis Georgiopoulos,et al.  Enterprise-wide product design: Linking optimal design decisions to the theory of the firm. , 2003 .

[56]  Wei Chen,et al.  An Approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling , 2003 .

[57]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[58]  P. Papalambros,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL DESIGN OPTIMIZATION FRAMEWORK FOR BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[59]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  DETC 2003 / DAC-48734 ANALYTICAL TARGET SETTING : AN ENTERPRISE CONTEXT IN OPTIMAL PRODUCT DESIGN , 2003 .

[60]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  AN OPTIMAL MARKETING AND ENGINEERING DESIGN MODEL FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT USING ANALYTICAL TARGET CASCADING , 2004 .

[61]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  A Study of Fuel Efficiency and Emission Policy Impact on Optimal Vehicle Design Decisions , 2004 .

[62]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Weights, Norms, and Notation in Analytical Target Cascading , 2005 .

[63]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Linking Optimal Design Decisions to the Theory of the Firm: The Case of Resource Allocation , 2005 .

[64]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  AN EFFICIENT WEIGHTING UPDATE METHOD TO ACHIEVE ACCEPTABLE CONSISTENCY DEVIATION IN ANALYTICAL TARGET CASCADING , 2005 .

[65]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .