Handling Complexity Aspects in Conceptual Ship Design

In this paper we present strategies to handle complexity during the conceptual phase of ship design. We introduce the issue by summarizing key ship design advancements during the last six decades, showing the growth in information, which leads to a more complex system. A definition of complexity based on the amount of information necessary to define the system is then discussed, placing the ship as a complex system. A general approach to handle complexity is presented, based on decomposition and encapsulation. Five main aspects of complexity are presented (structural, behavioral, contextual, temporal and perceptual), linking challenges of the conceptual phase to each of the aspects. As case example, techniques to handle the five aspects of an offshore support vessel design are briefly presented. The last section discusses the benefits of the five aspects classification and proposes possible uses and extensions.

[1]  Dj Andrews,et al.  The impact of simulation on preliminary ship design , 2009 .

[2]  M. E. Fitzgerald,et al.  Sustaining lifecycle value: Valuable changeability analysis with era simulation , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 2012.

[3]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Complex System Classification , 2004 .

[4]  Michael A. Bishop.  Existential Cognition: Computational Minds in the World , 1997 .

[5]  Dj Andrews.  A creative approach to ship architecture , 2003 .

[6]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Optimized selection of air emission controls for vessels , 2012 .

[7]  A. Hagen.  The extension of system boundaries in ship design , 2010 .

[8]  David Andrews,et al.  State of the Art Report on Design Methodology , 1997 .

[9]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Shaping Socio-technical System Innovation Strategies using a Five Aspects Taxonomy , 2010 .

[10]  Dj Andrews.  The Use of Simulation in Preliminary Ship Design , 2005 .

[11]  Robert Ian Whitfield,et al.  The application of multi-objective robust design methods in ship design , 1999 .

[12]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Scenario planning in dynamic multi-attribute tradespace exploration , 2009, 2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[13]  A. N. Kolmogorov.  Combinatorial foundations of information theory and the calculus of probabilities , 1983 .

[14]  David J. Singer,et al.  Impacts of Fuzzy Logic Modeling for Constraints Optimization , 2010 .

[15]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Responsive systems comparison method: Dynamic insights into designing a satellite radar system , 2009 .

[16]  Philippe Rigo,et al.  Ship complexity assessment at the concept design stage , 2011 .

[17]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[18]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  DECISION-BASED DESIGN - A CONTEMPORARY PARADIGM FOR SHIP DESIGN , 1990 .

[19]  Dj Andrews.  Marine Design – Requirement Elucidation rather than Requirement Engineering , 2003 .

[20]  David J. Singer,et al.  State of the art report on design for X , 2009 .

[21]  Anders Ulfvarson,et al.  Environmental Improvements in Ship Design by the Use of Scoring Functions , 2006 .

[22]  Dj Andrews.  Simulation and the design building block approach in the design of ships and other complex systems , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Suh Nam-pyo,et al.  Complexity: Theory and Applications , 2005 .

[24]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  11.1.1 Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis , 2008 .

[25]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  HANDLING TEMPORAL COMPLEXITY IN THE DESIGN OF NON-TRANSPORT SHIPS USING EPOCH-ERA ANALYSIS , 2012 .

[26]  Ehsan Mesbahi,et al.  Methodology for sustainability analysis of ships , 2008 .

[27]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Five aspects of engineering complex systems emerging constructs and methods , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Systems Conference.

[28]  Dj Andrews,et al.  A comprehensive methodology for the design of ships (and other complex systems) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  H. Schneekluth,et al.  Ship Design for Efficiency and Economy , 1987 .

[30]  Steve Caplin,et al.  Principles Of Design , 2011 .

[31]  V. Bertram,et al.  Simulation-based ship design , 2005, Europe Oceans 2005.

[32]  Hans Hopman,et al.  Challenges in computer applications for ship and floating structure design and analysis , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..