Beyond SDI: Integrating Science and Communities to Create Environmental Policies for the Sustainability of the Amazon

This paper will explore ways to go beyond the traditional SDI (spatial data infrastructures) in the direction of the Digital Earth, with the objective of supporting environmental policies that will lead to sustainability. We use the Amazon region as a starting point for the discussion. Environmental policy making for a place such as the Amazon has to take into account that phenomena occur and are modeled in various geographic scales, ranging from microbiology to planetary climate impacts. There are also multiple and sometimes conflicting views on the same reality, including the many scientific disciplines, governmental and non-governmental views, and the view of the local populations. Currently, the combination of technologies, people, and policies that defines an SDI is probably the best approximation we have to solve these problems, but some important elements are missing. A broader SDI would be an enabler for understanding space, not only delivering general-purpose maps, but disseminating spatial data to support policies for sustainable development. We think it is necessary to go beyond SDI to integrate science and communities in the effort of creating, enforcing, assessing, and revising environmental policies. We discuss the limitations of current SDIs with regards to data and information flow, semantics, and community building. We also review the information needs and modeling challenges for SDIs when used as a support for environmental policy making.

[1]  P. Fearnside Land-Tenure Issues as Factors in Environmental Destruction in Brazilian Amazonia: The Case of Southern Para , 2001 .

[2]  Pedro Leite da Silva Dias,et al.  The Large‐Scale Biosphere‐Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA): Insights and future research needs , 2002 .

[3]  Acknowledgments , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[4]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Ian Masser GIS Worlds: Creating Spatial Data Infrastructures , 2005 .

[6]  Klaus Greve,et al.  Requirements for Next Generation Spatial Data Infrastructures‐Standardized Web Based Geoprocessing and Web Service Orchestration , 2007, Trans. GIS.

[7]  Gilberto Câmara,et al.  Spatial statistical analysis of land-use determinants in the Brazilian Amazonia: Exploring intra-regional heterogeneity , 2007 .

[8]  Pedro Ronalt Vieira,et al.  Spatial Data Infrastructure for Amazon , 2008 .

[9]  David J. Saab An Ethnorelative Framework for Information Systems Design , 2008, AMCIS.

[10]  Eli Kintisch,et al.  Improved Monitoring of Rainforests Helps Pierce Haze of Deforestation , 2007, Science.

[11]  Michael J. G. Hopkins,et al.  Modelling the known and unknown plant biodiversity of the Amazon Basin , 2007 .

[12]  W. Clark Sustainability Science: A room of its own , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Paulo Artaxo,et al.  Amazonia and the modern carbon cycle: lessons learned , 2005, Oecologia.

[14]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Play as the Way Out of the Newspeak-Tower of Babel Dilemma in Data Modeling , 2005, ICIS.

[15]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Understanding Global Change: The Role of Geographic Information Science in the Integration of People and Nature , 2009 .

[16]  José dos Campos,et al.  Space-time dynamics of deforestation in Brazilian Amazônia , 2002 .

[17]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.