Impact of coupling a microscale computational fluid dynamics model with a mesoscale model on urban scale contaminant transport and dispersion

Abstract Results are presented from a study designed to evaluate the impact upon urban area transport and dispersion (T&D) modeling accuracy by coupling a microscale computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model with a mesoscale numerical weather prediction (NWP) model. The CFD model taking part in the evaluation was the CFD-Urban model while the NWP model was the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. The following two different approaches of supplying initial and boundary conditions to drive CFD-Urban were evaluated by comparing the resulting tracer gas transport fields to field data: (i) using observation obtained from a single sounding site during the URBAN 2000 field experiment and (ii) using WRF output in quasi-steady mode. The WRF and the CFD-Urban model results were evaluated against data obtained from the Intensive Observation Period (IOP) 10 during the URBAN 2000 field experiment. It was found that the CFD-Urban T&D prediction was significantly improved when using wind fields produced by downscaling WRF output as initial and boundary conditions. One key reason for such success is that the turning of lower boundary layer wind and pressure gradient are well represented in the time-varying three-dimensional WRF fields.

[1]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[2]  Kevin W. Manning,et al.  The Integrated WRF/Urban Modeling System: Development, Evaluation, and Applications to Urban Environmental Problems , 2010 .

[3]  Fei Chen,et al.  Formation of horizontal convective rolls in urban areas , 2008 .

[4]  Jeffrey B. Basara,et al.  Verification of a Mesoscale Data-Assimilation and Forecasting System for the Oklahoma City Area during the Joint Urban 2003 Field Project , 2006 .

[5]  Rex Britter,et al.  A baseline urban dispersion model evaluated with Salt Lake City and Los Angeles tracer data , 2003 .

[6]  K. J. Allwine,et al.  OVERVIEW OF URBAN 2000 A Multiscale Field Study of Dispersion through an Urban Environment , 2002 .

[7]  Martin J. Leach,et al.  Evaluation of an Urban Canopy Parameterization in a Mesoscale Model , 2004 .

[8]  H. Kondo,et al.  A Simple Single-Layer Urban Canopy Model For Atmospheric Models: Comparison With Multi-Layer And Slab Models , 2001 .

[9]  M. Leach,et al.  A Validation of FEM3MP with Joint Urban 2003 Data , 2006 .

[10]  Fei Chen,et al.  An Observational and Modeling Study of Characteristics of Urban Heat Island and Boundary Layer Structures in Beijing , 2009 .

[11]  M. Furmanczyk,et al.  A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach for Urban Area Transport and Dispersion Modeling , 2005 .

[12]  Hiroyuki Kusaka,et al.  Thermal Effects of Urban Canyon Structure on the Nocturnal Heat Island: Numerical Experiment Using a Mesoscale Model Coupled with an Urban Canopy Model , 2004 .

[13]  Heagy,et al.  Comparisons of Transport and Dispersion Model Predictions of the URBAN 2000 Field Experiment , 2004 .

[14]  G. Stout,et al.  Atmospheric research. , 1973, Science.

[15]  William J. Coirier,et al.  CFD Modeling for Urban Area Contaminant Transport and Dispersion : Model Description and Data Requirements , 2005 .

[16]  Jordan G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2 , 2005 .