Microbubbles induce renal hemorrhage when exposed to diagnostic ultrasound in anesthetized rats.

The generation of ultrasound (US) bioeffects using a clinical imaging system is controversial. We tested the hypothesis that the presence of microbubbles in the US field of a medical imager induces biologic effects. Both kidneys of anesthetized rats were insonified for 5 min using a medical imaging system after the administration of microbubbles. One kidney was insonified using a continuous mode (30 Hz) and the opposite kidney was insonified using an intermittent (1 Hz) technique. The microbubbles were exposed to three different transducer frequencies and four transducer output powers. After insonification, the animals were euthanized, the kidneys were removed and their gross appearance scored under "blinded" conditions using a defined scale. After the administration of microbubbles, US imaging of the kidney caused hemorrhage in the renal tissue. The severity and area of hemorrhage increased with an increase in the transducer power and a decrease in the transducer frequency. Intermittent insonification in the presence of microbubbles produced a greater degree of renal hemorrhage than continuous imaging techniques.

[1]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  J. Fowlkes,et al.  Section 3‐‐selected biological properties of tissues: potential determinants of susceptibility to ultrasound‐induced bioeffects. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. , 2000, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  Effect of a Stabilized Microbubble Contrast Agent on CW Ultrasound Induced Red Blood Cell Lysis In Vitro , 1995 .

[4]  T C Skalak,et al.  Direct In Vivo Visualization of Intravascular Destruction of Microbubbles by Ultrasound and Its Local Effects on Tissue. , 1998, Circulation.

[5]  J. Fowlkes,et al.  Section 6‐‐mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas‐carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. , 2000, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[6]  R V Shohet,et al.  Echocardiographic destruction of albumin microbubbles directs gene delivery to the myocardium. , 2000, Circulation.

[7]  A. Brayman,et al.  Re-evaluation of the concept that high cell concentrations "protect" cells in vitro from ultrasonically induced lysis. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  S Daniels,et al.  Damage to red blood cells induced by acoustic cavitation. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  M. Simonson.  Endothelins: multifunctional renal peptides. , 1993, Physiological reviews.

[10]  H. Dittrich,et al.  Lack of bioeffects of ultrasound energy after intravenous administration of FS069 (Optison) in the anesthetized rabbit. , 1998, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[11]  M. Miller,et al.  Hemolysis of albunex-supplemented, 40% hematocrit human erythrocytes in vitro by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound: acoustic pressure and pulse length dependence. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  D. Miller,et al.  Enhancement of ultrasonically-induced hemolysis by perfluorocarbon-based compared to air-based echo-contrast agents. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  P A van Der Wouw,et al.  Premature ventricular contractions during triggered imaging with ultrasound contrast. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[14]  R. M. Thomas,et al.  Contrast-agent gas bodies enhance hemolysis induced by lithotripter shock waves and high-intensity focused ultrasound in whole blood. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  Sheila Podell,et al.  Physical and biochemical stability of Optison®, an injectable ultrasound contrast agent , 1999, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[16]  D. Miller,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound Activation of Contrast Agent Gas Bodies Induces Capillary Rupture in Mice. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  D. Sahn,et al.  Myocardial imaging with a new transpulmonary lipid-fluorocarbon echo contrast agent: experimental studies in pigs. , 1996, American heart journal.

[18]  R S Meltzer,et al.  Hemolysis in vivo from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  D. Sahn,et al.  Gas fIIIed lipid bilayers as imaging contrast agents , 1994 .

[20]  D S Segar,et al.  Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase III Multicenter Trial. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  D. Miller,et al.  The influence of ultrasound frequency and gas-body composition on the contrast agent-mediated enhancement of vascular bioeffects in mouse intestine. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  Junru Wu,et al.  Ultrasound-induced cell lysis and sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  E. Carstensen,et al.  Lysis of erythrocytes by exposure to CW ultrasound. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of contrast agent destruction , 2000 .

[25]  P. Riesz,et al.  Free radical formation induced by ultrasound and its biological implications. , 1992, Free radical biology & medicine.

[26]  Feng Yan,et al.  BR1: A New Ultrasonographic Contrast Agent Based on Sulfur Hexafluoride-Filled Microbubbles , 1995, Investigative radiology.

[27]  D. Petitti,et al.  Epidemiology of human exposure to ultrasound: a critical review. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[28]  J. Wojtczak,et al.  Lack of lung hemorrhage in humans after intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography with ultrasound exposure conditions similar to those causing lung hemorrhage in laboratory animals. , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[29]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  Biological Effects of Ultrasound. The Perceived Safety of Diagnostic Ultrasound Within the Context of Ultrasound Biophysics: A Personal Perspective , 1997, Echocardiography.

[30]  R E Apfel,et al.  Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  E. Carstensen,et al.  The influence of contrast agents on hemorrhage produced by lithotripter fields. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  K. Takayama,et al.  Dynamic behavior of bubbles during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[33]  M. Miller,et al.  Erosion of artificial endothelia in vitro by pulsed ultrasound: acoustic pressure, frequency, membrane orientation and microbubble contrast agent dependence. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  M. Brezis,et al.  Radiocontrast agents induce endothelin release in vivo and in vitro. , 1992, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[35]  C. Cox,et al.  Hemolysis of 40% hematocrit, Albunex-supplemented human erythrocytes by pulsed ultrasound: frequency, acoustic pressure and pulse length dependence. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[36]  T. Ponchon,et al.  Hepatic lesions in the rabbit induced by acoustic cavitation. , 1991, Gastroenterology.