Product diversification to enhance economic viability of second generation ethanol production in Brazil: The case of the sugar and ethanol joint production

Abstract Commercial simulator Aspen Plus® was used to simulate the conventional processes of the autonomous distillery producing ethanol and the joint production of sugar and ethanol. Changes in conventional processes were evaluated to increase electricity and second generation ethanol production using bagasse fine fraction composed by parenchyma cells (P-fraction). The evaluated processes were thermal and water integrated. The results indicated that the integration of the second generation process to the conventional processes was possible after thermal and water integration. The economic analysis showed that the second generation process integrated to the joint production presented lower payback time, 2.3 years, in comparison with this process integrated to the autonomous distillery, 4.7 years. Due to the high enzyme costs, the cases without second generation ethanol production presented higher economic viability. Product diversification, as sugar and ethanol production in the same site, lowered the impact of enzymes cost on the payback time of second generation process, showing that the integration of the second generation ethanol production process to the conventional sugar production process could be a step to cellulosic ethanol production feasibility in sugarcane mills.

[1]  M. E. D. Silva,et al.  Brazilian sugarcane bagasse: energy and non-energy consumption. , 2012 .

[2]  Ian C. Kemp,et al.  Pinch Analysis and Process Integration: A User Guide on Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy , 2007 .

[3]  V. Putsche,et al.  Development of an ASPEN PLUS physical property database for biofuels components , 1996 .

[4]  Antonio J. A. Meirelles,et al.  Double-effect integration of multicomponent alcoholic distillation columns , 2012 .

[5]  W. Mabee,et al.  Will second‐generation ethanol be able to compete with first‐generation ethanol? Opportunities for cost reduction , 2012 .

[6]  Maciej Starzak,et al.  Temperature dependence of water activity in aqueous solutions of sucrose , 2006 .

[7]  Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez,et al.  Design and planning of infrastructures for bioethanol and sugar production under demand uncertainty , 2012 .

[8]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Reduction of irreversibility generation in sugar and ethanol production from sugarcane , 2009 .

[9]  Karina A. Ojeda,et al.  Evaluation of technological alternatives for process integration of sugarcane bagasse for sustainable biofuels production—Part 1 , 2011 .

[10]  P. Rein.  Cane Sugar Engineering , 2007 .

[11]  Silvia A. Nebra,et al.  Bagasse Dryer Role in the Energy Recovery of Water Tube Boilers , 2009 .

[12]  J. Nolasco,et al.  Thermal degradation kinetics of sucrose, glucose and fructose in sugarcane must for bioethanol production. , 2006 .

[13]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Assessing resource intensity and renewability of cellulosic ethanol technologies using eco-LCA. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  C. Cardona,et al.  Production of bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse: Status and perspectives. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[15]  Argimiro Resende Secchi,et al.  Integrated tool for simulation and optimization of a first and second generation ethanol-from-sugarcane production plant , 2012 .

[16]  Silvio de Oliveira Junior,et al.  Supercritical steam cycles and biomass integrated gasification combined cycles for sugarcane mills , 2010 .

[17]  Bodo Linnhoff,et al.  A User guide on process integration for the efficient use of energy , 1994 .

[18]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Exergetic analysis of the integrated first- and second-generation ethanol production from sugarcane , 2013 .

[19]  Rubens Maciel Filho,et al.  Simulation of integrated first and second generation bioethanol production from sugarcane: comparison between different biomass pretreatment methods , 2011, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[20]  Rubens Maciel Filho,et al.  Economic and environmental assessment of integrated 1st and 2nd generation sugarcane bioethanol production evaluating different 2nd generation process alternatives , 2012 .

[21]  M. Galbe,et al.  SO2-catalyzed steam pretreatment and fermentation of enzymatically hydrolyzed sugarcane bagasse , 2010 .

[22]  Piotr Oleskowicz-Popiel,et al.  The challenge of enzyme cost in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  R. M. Filho,et al.  Second generation ethanol in Brazil: can it compete with electricity production? , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[24]  Michael R Ladisch,et al.  Liquid hot water pretreatment of cellulosic biomass. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[25]  Vicente Corrêa Neto,et al.  Analises de Opções Tecnológicas para Projetos de Co-geração no Setor Sucro-Alcooleiro , 2002 .

[26]  Argimiro R. Secchi,et al.  Assessing the production of first and second generation bioethanol from sugarcane through the integration of global optimization and process detailed modeling , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[27]  Kelly N. Ibsen,et al.  Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover , 2002 .

[28]  Krist V. Gernaey,et al.  Biorefining: Computer aided tools for sustainable design and analysis of bioethanol production , 2009 .

[29]  Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos.  Sugarcane-based bioethanol: energy for sustainable development , 2008 .

[30]  Antonio J. A. Meirelles,et al.  Ethanol dehydration by extractive distillation , 2007 .

[31]  R. M. Filho,et al.  Production of bioethanol and other bio-based materials from sugarcane bagasse: Integration to conventional bioethanol production process , 2009 .