Toward a comparative theory of agents

The purpose of this paper is to address some of the questions on the notion of agent and agency in relation to property and personhood. I argue that following the Kantian criticism of Aristotelian metaphysics, contemporary biotechnology and information and communication technologies bring about a new challenge—this time, with regard to the Kantian moral subject understood in the subject’s unique metaphysical qualities of dignity and autonomy. The concept of human dignity underlies the foundation of many democratic systems, particularly in Europe as well as of international treaties, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Digital agents, artificial organisms as well as new capabilities of the human agents related to their embeddedness in digital and biotechnological environments bring about an important transformation of the human self-appraisal. A critical comparative reflection of this transformation is important because of its ethical implications. I deal first with the concept of agent within the framework of Aristotelian philosophy, which is the basis for further theories in accordance with and/or in opposition to it, particularly since modernity. In the second part of this paper, I deal with the concept of personhood in Kantian philosophy, which supersedes the Aristotelian metaphysics of substance and builds the basis of a metaphysics of the moral human subject. In the third part, I discuss the question of artificial agents arising from modern biology and ICT. Blurring the difference between the human and the natural and/or artificial opens a “new space” for philosophical reflection as well as for debate in law and practical policy.

[1]  Immanuel Kant,et al.  Kritik der Urteilskraft , 2009 .

[2]  Santiago Zabala,et al.  Weakening Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Gianni Vattimo , 2006 .

[3]  Katherine Hayles,et al.  How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics , 2001 .

[4]  European Group on Ethics in Science and New Techno,et al.  Ethical Aspects of ICT Implants in the Human Body , 2005 .

[5]  P. Kleingeld,et al.  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .

[6]  吉田 量彦 書評 ロココの人カント?--Gernot Bohme, Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft in neuer Sicht. Frankfurt am Main(Suhrkamp), 1999. , 2005 .

[7]  Immanuel Kant,et al.  Die Metaphysik der Sitten , 1982 .

[8]  G. Vattimo,et al.  La fine della modernità , 1986 .

[9]  M. Heidegger Sein und Zeit , 1927 .

[10]  Günther Bien Die Grundlegung der politischen Philosophie bei Aristoteles , 1973 .

[11]  Immanuel Kant,et al.  Metaphysik der Sitten. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre , 2009 .

[12]  Andrew Balmer,et al.  Synthetic Biology: Social and Ethical Challenges , 2008 .

[13]  A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge. By George Berkeley ... With prolegomena, and with annotations, select, translated, and original. By Charles P. Krauth , 2003 .

[14]  D. Ihde Bodies in Technology , 2001 .

[15]  Rafael Capurro Beiträge zu einer digitalen Ontologie , 2000 .

[16]  George Berkeley,et al.  A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge, 1734 , 1971 .

[17]  J. Ritter,et al.  Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie , 1975 .

[18]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[19]  Immanuel Kant Schriften zur Anthropologie, Geschichtsphilosophie, Politik und Pädagogik , 1964 .

[20]  Hyo Yoon Kang Autonomic computing, genomic data and human agency: the case for embodiment , 2013, Law, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing.

[21]  Rafael Capurro,et al.  Towards an ontological foundation of information ethics , 2006, Ethics and Information Technology.

[22]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Berkeley's Philosophical Writings , 1965 .

[23]  Aristotle,et al.  Politics of Aristotle , 1973 .

[24]  Andrew Feenberg Active and Passive Bodies: Comments on Don Ihde's Bodies in Technology , 2003 .