Evolutionary Synchronization of Chaotic Systems

This chapter introduces a simple investigation on deterministic chaos synchronization by means of selected evolutionary techniques. Five evolutionary algorithms has been used for chaos synchronization here: differential evolution, self-organizing migrating algorithm, genetic algorithm, simulated annealing and evolutionary strategies in a total of 15 versions. Experiments in this chapter has been done with two different coupled systems (master — slave) — Rossler-Lorenz and Lorenz-Lorenz. The main aim of this chapter was to show that evolutionary algorithms, under certain conditions, are capable of synchronization of, at least, simple chaotic systems, when the cost function is properly defined as well as the parameters of selected evolutionary algorithm. This chapter consists of two different case studies. For all algorithms each simulation was 100 times repeated to show and check the robustness of proposed methods and experiment configurations. All data were processed to obtain summarized results and graphs.

[1]  Roman Senkerik,et al.  Investigation on evolutionary optimization of chaos control , 2009 .

[2]  Hans-Georg Beyer,et al.  The Theory of Evolution Strategies , 2001, Natural Computing Series.

[3]  D. Wolpert,et al.  No Free Lunch Theorems for Search , 1995 .

[4]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[5]  Jesus M. Gonzalez-miranda,et al.  Synchronization And Control Of Chaos: An Introduction For Scientists And Engineers , 2004 .

[6]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  No free lunch theorems for optimization , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[7]  N. Rulkov,et al.  Robustness of Synchronized Chaotic Oscillations , 1997 .

[8]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  New ideas in optimization , 1999 .

[9]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[10]  Ivan Zelinka,et al.  Real-time deterministic chaos control by means of selected evolutionary techniques , 2009, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[11]  Lars Nolle,et al.  On Step Width Adaptation in Simulated Annealing for Continuous Parameter Optimisation , 2001, Fuzzy Days.

[12]  V. Cerný Thermodynamical approach to the traveling salesman problem: An efficient simulation algorithm , 1985 .

[13]  Godfrey C. Onwubolu,et al.  New optimization techniques in engineering , 2004, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[14]  Eckehard Schöll,et al.  Handbook of Chaos Control , 2007 .

[15]  Kenneth V. Price,et al.  An introduction to differential evolution , 1999 .

[16]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[17]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization: Phase locking and frequency entrainment , 2001 .

[18]  Lars Nolle,et al.  Comparison of an self-organizing migration algorithm with simulated annealing and differential evolution for automated waveform tuning , 2005, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[19]  L. Tsimring,et al.  Generalized synchronization of chaos in directionally coupled chaotic systems. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[20]  Ivan Zelinka,et al.  Investigation on evolutionary deterministic chaos control , 2005 .

[21]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series) , 2005 .

[22]  Brown,et al.  Modeling and synchronizing chaotic systems from time-series data. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.