Mathematical Models of Juror and Jury Decision-Making

[1]  B. Grofman.  THE SLIPPERY SLOPE: Jury Size and Jury Verdict Requirements—Legal and Social Science Approaches , 1980 .

[2]  B. Grofman.  JURY DECISION MAKING MODELS AND THE SUPREME COURT: THE JURY CASES FROM WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA TO BALLEW v. GEORGIA* , 1980 .

[3]  J. Porter.  The laws of the land. , 1980, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[4]  M. Rothschild,et al.  A Model of the Jury Decision Process , 1979, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[5]  Michael J. Saks,et al.  Jury verdicts : the role of group size and social decision rule , 1978 .

[6]  Bernard Grofman,et al.  Judgmental competence of individuals and groups in a dichotomous choice situation: Is a majority of heads better than one? , 1978 .

[7]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Victim consequences, sentence severity, and decision processes in mock juries. , 1977 .

[8]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. , 1977 .

[9]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Interactions between jurors as a function of majority vs. unanimity decision rules. , 1977 .

[10]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Modeling the criminal justice system , 1977 .

[11]  S. Nagel,et al.  Legal policy analysis: Finding an optimum level or mix , 1977 .

[12]  R. Bray,et al.  The empirical study of decision processes in juries: A critical review , 1976 .

[13]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. , 1976 .

[14]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[15]  B. Grofman,et al.  A note on clique avoidance in repeated jury selection from among a fixed pool of jurors , 1976 .

[16]  J. L. Tapp.  Psychology and the Law: an Overture , 1976 .

[17]  N. Kerr,et al.  Social decision schemes of the same four-person groups on two different intellective tasks. , 1976 .

[18]  N. Vidmar,et al.  Psychology and the law : research frontiers , 1976 .

[19]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules. , 1975 .

[20]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Analyzing the Decision-Making Process of the American Jury , 1975 .

[21]  Bernard Grofman,et al.  A comment on ‘democratic theory: A preliminary mathematical model.’ , 1975 .

[22]  Richard Lempert,et al.  Uncovering "Nondiscernible" Differences: Empirical Research and the Jury-Size Cases , 1975 .

[23]  Kinley Larntz.  Reanalysis of Vidmar's data on the effects of decision alternatives on verdicts of simulated jurors , 1975 .

[24]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Deductive Modeling to Determine an Optimum Jury Size and Fraction Required to Convict , 1975 .

[25]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Modeling Jury Verdicts in the American Legal System , 1974 .

[26]  S. Diamond.  A Jury Experiment Reanalyzed , 1974 .

[27]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Social decision schemes under risk. , 1974 .

[28]  H. Zeisel,et al.  "Convincing Empirical Evidence" on the Six Member Jury , 1974 .

[29]  R. G. Kazmann.  Democratic organization: A preliminary mathematical model , 1973 .

[30]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  A Study of Poisson's Models for Jury Verdicts in Criminal and Civil Trials , 1973 .

[31]  G. William Walster,et al.  A comparative study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, Delphi groups, and nominal groups☆ , 1973 .

[32]  J. H. Davis.  Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[33]  N. Vidmar.  Effects of decision alternatives on the verdicts and social perceptions of simulated jurors. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Norman Schofield,et al.  Ethical Decision Rules for Uncertain Voters , 1972, British Journal of Political Science.

[35]  Herbert Friedman,et al.  Trial by Jury: Criteria for Convictions, Jury Size and Type I and Type II Errors , 1972 .

[36]  Richard G. Niemi,et al.  Probability models of collective decision making , 1972 .

[37]  Morris J. Bloomstein.  Verdict: The Jury System , 1972 .

[38]  B. E. Meserve.  An Introduction to Finite Mathematics , 1972 .

[39]  H. Zeisel.  The Waning of the American Jury , 1972 .

[40]  W. E. Feinberg.  Teaching the Type I and Type II Errors: The Judicial Process , 1971 .

[41]  R. Simon,et al.  Quantifying Burdens of Proof: A View from the Bench, the Jury, and the Classroom , 1971 .

[42]  M. A. Larkin.  Should the Military Less-Than-Unanimous Verdict of Guilt Be Retained? , 1971 .

[43]  H. Zeisel.  ...And Then There Were None: The Diminution of the Federal Jury , 1971 .

[44]  Michael O. Finkelstein,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence , 1970 .

[45]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Introduction to mathematical psychology , 1970 .

[46]  B. Grofman.  Some notes on voting schemes and the will of the majority , 1969 .

[47]  Michael Taylor,et al.  Critique and comment: Proof of a theorem on majority rule , 1969 .

[48]  D. Rae.  Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[49]  John Kaplan,et al.  Decision Theory and the Factfinding Process , 1968 .

[50]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Readings in attitude theory and measurement , 1968 .

[51]  T. Scheff,et al.  The Jury and the Defense of Insanity. , 1968 .

[52]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .

[53]  E. A. Maxwell,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Sociology , 1965 .

[54]  Allen Parducci,et al.  Range-frequency compromise in judgment. , 1963 .

[55]  C. Coombs.  A theory of data. , 1965, Psychological review.

[56]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[57]  G. Thompson,et al.  The Theory of Committees and Elections. , 1959 .

[58]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Games and Decisions. , 1960 .

[59]  J. Kemeny,et al.  Introduction to finite mathematics , 1957 .

[60]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[61]  Dale W. Broeder.  The Functions of the Jury Facts or Fictions , 1954 .

[62]  W. Feller.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1959 .

[63]  Oliver P. Shiras.  The Jury System , 1891 .

[64]  Siméon-Denis Poisson.  Recherches sur la probabilité des jugements en matière criminelle et en matiére civile, précédées des règles générales du calcul des probabilités , 1837 .