Towards Pedagogy-Driven Learning Design: A Case Study of Problem-Based Learning Design

Existing learning design languages are pedagogy-neutral. They provide insufficient support to explicitly represent pedagogy-specific approaches such as problem-based learning (PBL). As the first step towards pedagogy-driven learning design, we developed a PBL design language and an associated authoring tool by adopting a domain-specific language (DSL) approach. The language and the tool provide means for teachers to think and represent their own PBL designs in vocabularies that the teacher daily uses to describe their PBL approaches. This paper presents a case study to investigate whether the language and the tool can facilitate the design of a PBL course plan. Although participants had minimal knowledge of PBL and were not skilled in process modeling, after a short training they were able to prepare their own PBL course plans using the PBL authoring tool. They reported that the vocabularies in the PBL design language were easy to understand. Some thought that the tool provides flexibility and others did not think so. Nevertheless, some found the process somewhat difficult to represent the narrative into a course plan. In addition, most participants found that the tool is user-friendly and easy to learn.

[1]  Barry Harper,et al.  A visual learning design representation to facilitate dissemination and reuse of innovative pedagogical strategies in university teaching , 2008 .

[2]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice , 2006 .

[3]  Wim H. Gijselaers,et al.  Bringing Problem-Based Learning To Higher Education: Theory And Practice , 1996 .

[4]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction , 1985 .

[5]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Management of change : Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering , 2007 .

[6]  Barry Harper,et al.  Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies , 2008 .

[7]  Colin Tattersall,et al.  Preface to Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training , 2005 .

[8]  Rhona Sharpe,et al.  Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing and Delivering E-Learning , 2007 .

[9]  G. Conole,et al.  Visualising learning design to foster and support good practice and creativity , 2008 .

[10]  Colin Tattersall,et al.  Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training , 2010 .

[11]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[12]  Barry Harper,et al.  Supporting university teachers create pedagogically sound learning environments using learning designs and learning objects , 2006 .

[13]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Representing models of practice , 2008 .

[14]  Rob Koper,et al.  Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical meta-model behind EML , 2001 .

[15]  H. Barrows.  The Tutorial Process , 1992 .

[16]  H. Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  Visual Modelling of Collaborative Learning Processes - Uses, Desired Properties, and Approaches , 2008 .

[17]  Mark Barrett-Baxendale,et al.  From Reload to ReCourse: learning from IMS Learning Design implementations , 2009 .

[18]  Colin Tattersall,et al.  The Learning Design Specification , 2005 .

[19]  Helen Beetham,et al.  Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age , 2007 .

[20]  Rob Koper,et al.  An efficient and flexible technical approach to develop and deliver online peer assessment , 2007, CSCL.

[21]  Luca Botturi,et al.  Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theories and Practices , 2007 .

[22]  B. Nardi.  Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[23]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  CSCL scripts: modelling features and potential use , 2005, CSCL.

[24]  Susanne Neumann,et al.  User Evaluation of a Graphical Modeling Tool for IMS Learning Design , 2009, ICWL.

[25]  A. Lejeune,et al.  Modeling Collaborative Learning Activities on e-Learning Platforms , 2006 .

[26]  Marianne Georgsen,et al.  Identifying Differences in Understandings of PBL, Theory and Interactional Interdependencies , 2010 .

[27]  Kai Pata,et al.  Pedagogy-driven design of digital learning ecosystems , 2014, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Rynson W. H. Lau,et al.  Advances in Web Based Learning - ICWL 2009, 8th International Conference, Aachen, Germany, August 19-21, 2009. Proceedings , 2009, ICWL.

[29]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[30]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning , 2003 .

[31]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[32]  James Dalziel,et al.  Implementing learning design : the Learning Activity Management System (LAMS) , 2003 .

[33]  E. Graaff,et al.  History of problem-based and project-based learning , 2007 .

[34]  Jen Harvey,et al.  Designing for learning , 2006 .

[35]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Learning Theories and Problem-Based Learning , 2012 .

[36]  Arie van Deursen,et al.  Domain-specific languages: an annotated bibliography , 2000, SIGP.

[37]  Alev Ateş.  Gagni, R. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. 4th edition, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., Florida-ABD. , 2010 .

[38]  K. Kuutti.  Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .