The measurement of interface pressure applied by sports compression garments: A comparative study of two portable devices

Abstract The interface pressure applied by compression clothing is an important measure in evaluating the efficacy of the bio-physical impact of compression. The aim was to compare two portable pneumatic pressure measuring devices (PicoPress and Kikuhime), against a non-portable, Hohenstein System (HOSY) reference standard, used by medical regulatory agencies. Interface pressure obtained in-vivo (calf) by the PicoPress and Kikuhime, were compared with HOSY. The mean bias and limits of agreement indicate the PicoPress satisfies the a priori thresholds for acceptable validity at the posterior and lateral orientation with calf stockings (−0.4[−3.3;2.5]; 0.5[−3.4;4.4] mmHg) and tights (0.2[−4.7;5.1]; 1.2[−0.3;5.4] mmHg) respectively. The Kikuhime did not satisfy thresholds for acceptable validity at any orientation, overestimating the pressure compared with HOSY. We recommend using the PicoPress, specifically at the posterior or lateral aspect of the calf. This is of particular relevance when the hosiery is applying relatively low levels of pressure, applicable to sports compression.

[1]  M. Clark,et al.  Chronic edema of the lower extremities: international consensus recommendations for compression therapy clinical research trials. , 2012, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[2]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Skin pressure profiles and variations with body postural changes beneath medical elastic compression stockings , 2007, International journal of dermatology.

[3]  S. Thomas,et al.  Practical limitations of two devices used for the measurement of sub-bandage pressure: implications for clinical practice. , 2014, Journal of wound care.

[4]  L. Mourot,et al.  Compression Sleeves Increase Tissue Oxygen Saturation But Not Running Performance , 2011, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[5]  M. Clark,et al.  Measurement of Lower Leg Compression In Vivo: Recommendations for the Performance of Measurements of Interface Pressure and Stiffness , 2006, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[6]  H. Partsch,et al.  Occupational leg oedema is more reduced by antigraduated than by graduated stockings. , 2013, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[7]  Ruya Li,et al.  Comparison of piezoresistive sensor to PicoPress® in in-vitro interface pressure measurement , 2018, Phlebology.

[8]  Hugo Partsch,et al.  Compression therapy: clinical and experimental evidence. , 2012, Annals of vascular diseases.

[9]  Billy Sperlich,et al.  Is There Evidence that Runners can Benefit from Wearing Compression Clothing? , 2016, Sports Medicine.

[10]  Yi Li,et al.  A three-dimensional biomechanical model for numerical simulation of dynamic pressure functional performances of graduated compression stocking (GCS) , 2006 .

[11]  W. Boeckx,et al.  Reproducibility of repeated measurements with the Kikuhime pressure sensor under pressure garments in burn scar treatment. , 2007, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[12]  Michel Chauveau,et al.  Compression garments and exercise: no influence of pressure applied. , 2015, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[13]  Pierre Badel,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Pressure Applied on the Lower Leg by Elastic Compression Bandage , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[15]  Glyn Howatson,et al.  Compression garments and recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage: a meta-analysis , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[16]  Aaron T Scanlan,et al.  The effects of wearing undersized lower-body compression garments on endurance running performance. , 2011, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[17]  H. Partsch,et al.  Inelastic bandages maintain their hemodynamic effectiveness over time despite significant pressure loss. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  D. Jolley,et al.  Sub-bandage Pressure Difference of Tubular Form and Short-stretch Compression Bandages: In-vivo Randomised Controlled Trial , 2010 .

[19]  H Partsch,et al.  Comparison of three portable instruments to measure compression pressure. , 2010, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[20]  N. Brophy-Williams,et al.  Evaluating the Kikuhime pressure monitor for use with sports compression clothing , 2014 .

[21]  H. Partsch,et al.  Thigh compression after great saphenous surgery is more effective with high pressure. , 2009, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[22]  Charles R. Pedlar,et al.  The variation in pressures exerted by commercially available compression garments , 2015 .

[23]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  Management of chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs. Guidelines According to Scientific Evidence. Part I. , 2020, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[24]  J. Krouwer.  Why Bland–Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  L. Vinckx,et al.  Analysis of the pressure perturbation due to the introduction of a measuring probe under an elastic garment , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[26]  M. Neumann,et al.  Pressure Differences of Elastic Compression Stockings at the Ankle Region , 1997, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[27]  H. Partsch,et al.  Classification of compression stockings: report of the meeting of the International Compression Club, Copenhagen. , 2016, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.