The use of Evolving Graph Combinatorial Model in Routing Protocols for Dynamic Networks

The assessment of routing protocols for ad hoc networks is a difficult task, due to the networks’ highly dynamic behavior and the absence of benchmarks. Recently, a graph theoretic model – the evolving graphs – was proposed to help capture the network topology changes during time, with predictable dynamics at least. The algorithms and insights obtained through this model are theoretically very efficient and intriguing. However, there is no study about the use of such theoretical results into practical situations. We used the NS2 network simulator to first implement an evolving graph based routing protocol, and then used it as a benchmark when comparing four major ad-hoc routing protocols. Interestingly, our experiments showed that evolving graphs have the potential to be an effective and powerful tool. In order to make this model widely applicable, however, some practical issues still have to be addressed and incorporated into the model.

[1]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[2]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[3]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[4]  Joseph P. Macker,et al.  Mobile Ad hoc Networking (MANET): Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation Considerations , 1999, RFC.

[5]  Voon Chin Phua,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1999 .

[6]  Gregory A. Hansen,et al.  The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol , 2003 .

[7]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[8]  Afonso Ferreira,et al.  Topological design, routing, and handover in satellite networks , 2002 .

[9]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Handbook of Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing , 2002 .

[10]  Afonso Ferreira,et al.  Computing Shortest, Fastest, and Foremost Journeys in Dynamic Networks , 2003, Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci..

[11]  Daniel Lang,et al.  A comprehensive overview about selected Ad Hoc Networking Routing Protocols , 2003 .

[12]  Afonso Ferreira,et al.  Building a reference combinatorial model for MANETs , 2004, IEEE Network.

[13]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 2004, Mob. Networks Appl..

[14]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Handbook of Sensor Networks: Algorithms and Architectures , 2005, Handbook of Sensor Networks.

[15]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  A Routing Protocol for Hierarchical LEO/MEO Satellite IP Networks , 2005, Wirel. Networks.

[16]  Jie Wu Handbook on Theoretical and Algorithmic Aspects of Sensor, Ad Hoc Wireless, and Peer-to-Peer Networks , 2005 .

[17]  Marcelo G. Rubinstein,et al.  A Survey on Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2006, MWCN.

[18]  Zhensheng Zhang,et al.  Routing in intermittently connected mobile ad hoc networks and delay tolerant networks: overview and challenges , 2006, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[19]  Afonso Ferreira,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Networks using an Evolving Graph Combinatorial Model , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications.

[20]  C. Siva Ram Murthy,et al.  On the Use of Multiple Hops in Next Generation Wireless Systems , 2006, Wirel. Networks.

[21]  Afonso Ferreira,et al.  Using Evolving Graphs Foremost Journeys to Evaluate Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols , 2007 .

[22]  Afonso Ferreira,et al.  On the Evaluation of Shortest Journeys in Dynamic Networks , 2007, Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA 2007).

[23]  Antonio Alfredo Ferreira Loureiro,et al.  Coverage area management for wireless sensor networks , 2007, Int. J. Netw. Manag..