Routines and transactive memory systems: Creating, coordinating, retaining, and transferring knowledge in organizations

Abstract This chapter compares and contrasts the effects of two knowledge repositories, routines and transactive memory systems (TMSs), on knowledge creation, coordination, retention and transfer. We provide overviews of research on the two knowledge repositories, with particular attention to how they form and change. We then discuss the relationship between routines and TMSs. We also compare and contrast routines and TMSs in terms of their capabilities to promote knowledge creation, coordination, retention and transfer in organizations. Routines can transfer across organizations, and they are resilient to member turnover. Although routines can be a source of inertia, they can also enable change. TMSs are susceptible to member turnover and are not easily transferred to other organizations. TMSs promote innovation and are particularly valuable under conditions of uncertainty. We argue that TMSs and routines are reciprocally related. Routines can seed TMSs and TMSs can crystalize into routines. We hope that our chapter stimulates future research on the interrelationship between routines and TMSs and their effects on knowledge creation, coordination, retention, and transfer in organizations.

[1]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[2]  Anne Marie Knott,et al.  Redesigning routines for replication , 2015 .

[3]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[4]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .

[5]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[6]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[7]  Ciaran Heavey,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems and Firm Performance: An Upper Echelons Perspective , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[9]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[10]  A. Lewin,et al.  The evolution of organizational routines among large Western and Japanese firms , 2002 .

[11]  Yuqing Ren,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems , 2012 .

[12]  Michael X Cohen.  Reading Dewey: Reflections on the Study of Routine , 2007 .

[13]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[14]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[15]  Boris Groysberg,et al.  Can They Take It With Them? The Portability of Star Knowledge Workers' Performance , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[16]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[17]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance Effects , 2002 .

[18]  L. Argote.  Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[19]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Linda Argote,et al.  Repositories of Knowledge in Franchise Organizations: Individual, Structural, and Technological , 2001 .

[21]  A. Hollingshead.  Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  M. Feldman,et al.  Routines as a Source of Change in Organizational Schemata: The Role of Trial-and-Error Learning , 2011 .

[23]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Routines as Process: Past, Present, and Future , 2016 .

[24]  S FeldmanMartha.  Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[25]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[26]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[27]  Boris Groysberg,et al.  Hiring Stars and Their Colleagues: Exploration and Exploitation in Professional Service Firms , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[29]  Jan W. Rivkin.  Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[30]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[31]  A. Lewin,et al.  Innovators and imitators: Organizational reference groups and adoption of organizational routines , 2005 .

[32]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[33]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[34]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology and Transactive Memory Systems on Knowledge Sharing, Application, and Team Performance: A Field Study , 2010, MIS Q..

[35]  Aimée A. Kane.  Unlocking Knowledge Transfer Potential: Knowledge Demonstrability and Superordinate Social Identity , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Anne Marie Knott,et al.  The organizational routines factor market paradox , 2003 .

[37]  The routine may be stable but the advantage is not: competitive implications of key employee mobility , 2010 .

[38]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[39]  D. Wegner,et al.  Cognitive interdependence in close relationships , 1985 .

[40]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[41]  L. Argote,et al.  Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks , 2016 .

[42]  B. Sparrow,et al.  Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips , 2011, Science.

[43]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[44]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  The role of transactive memory in the formation of organizational routines , 2014 .

[45]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[46]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[47]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Organizational Character: On the Regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Ann Langley,et al.  The Interplay of Reflective and Experimental Spaces in Interrupting and Reorienting Routine Dynamics , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[49]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991 .

[50]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[51]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems: Current Issues and Future Research Directions , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Aleksander P. J. Ellis,et al.  Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes , 2009 .

[53]  R. Moreland.  Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .

[54]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  When Does Repository KMS Use Lift Performance? The Role of Alternative Knowledge Sources and Task Environments , 2016, MIS Q..

[55]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[56]  John R. Austin.  Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge ☆ , 2007 .

[58]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality , 2005 .

[59]  Michael J. Fern,et al.  Examining the Stability and Variability of Routine Performances: The Effects of Experience and Context Change , 2012 .

[60]  William R. King,et al.  Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations , 2005, MIS Q..

[61]  John Byrne,et al.  Knowledge Networks in New Product Development Projects: A Transactive Memory Perspective , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[62]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[63]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[64]  Robert S. Huckman,et al.  Managing the Impact of Employee Turnover on Performance: The Role of Process Conformance , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[65]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Dynamics of Performing and Remembering Organizational Routines , 2012 .

[66]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[67]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Social Network Ties, Transactive Memory, and Performance in Groups , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[68]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[69]  Anupam Agrawal,et al.  Does Organizational Forgetting Affect Vendor Quality Performance? An Empirical Investigation , 2015, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[70]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[71]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  The (N)Ever-Changing World: Stability and Change in Organizational Routines , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[72]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[73]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[74]  Anne O'Brien,et al.  Developing Transactive Memory Systems , 2012 .

[75]  Kyle Lewis.  Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[77]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning and Forgetting: The Effects of Turnover and Structure , 2006 .

[78]  Y. Connie Yuan,et al.  The impact of awareness and accessibility on expertise retrieval: A multilevel network perspective , 2010 .

[79]  D. Broadbent,et al.  On the Relationship between Task Performance and Associated Verbalizable Knowledge , 1984 .

[80]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[81]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective , 2003 .

[82]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[83]  M. Feldman.  Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[84]  John Byrne,et al.  Transactive memory system in new product development teams , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[85]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[86]  Gino Cattani,et al.  Competitive Implications of Interfirm Mobility , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[87]  Linda Argote,et al.  Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. , 1996 .

[88]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[89]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[90]  Linda Argote,et al.  First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity , 2010 .

[91]  B. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action , 1994 .

[92]  Damon J. Phillips.  A Genealogical Approach to Organizational Life Chances: The Parent-Progeny Transfer among Silicon Valley Law Firms, 1946–1996 , 2002 .

[93]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  Expecting the Unexpected? How SWAT Officers and Film Crews Handle Surprises , 2011 .

[94]  Preeta M. Banerjee,et al.  Resetting the Shot Clock , 2014 .

[95]  Christina Fang,et al.  Organizational Learning as Credit Assignment: A Model and Two Experiments , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[96]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  Structure and Learning in Self-Managed Teams: Why "Bureaucratic" Teams Can Be Better Learners , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[97]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[98]  S. Winter,et al.  Evolutionary theorizing in economics , 2002 .

[99]  David Seidl,et al.  Talking About Routines: The Role of Reflective Talk in Routine Change , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[100]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[101]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[102]  A. Hollingshead.  Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems , 1998 .

[103]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[104]  Dimo Ringov,et al.  Overcoming Stickiness: How the Timing of Knowledge Transfer Methods Affects Transfer Difficulty , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[105]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[106]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  The combination of explicit and implicit learning processes in task control , 1987 .

[107]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[108]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Potential Benefits of Communication in Transactive Memory Systems , 2003 .

[109]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[110]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[111]  Kishore Sengupta,et al.  The Microevolution of Routines: How Problem Solving and Social Preferences Interact , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[112]  Aleksander P. J. Ellis,et al.  Building the infrastructure: the effects of role identification behaviors on team cognition development and performance. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[113]  Enno Siemsen,et al.  Decay, Shock, and Renewal: Operational Routines and Process Entropy in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[114]  Yuqing Ren,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems 1985–2010: An Integrative Framework of Key Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences , 2011 .

[115]  Anne Marie Knott,et al.  The Dynamic Value of Hierarchy , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[116]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[117]  Thorbjørn Knudsen,et al.  Inertia in Routines: A Hidden Source of Organizational Variation , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[118]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors , 2006 .

[119]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Dynamics of Organizational Routines: A Generative Model , 2012 .

[120]  David J. Teece,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action , 2012 .

[121]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville.  The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[122]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[123]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[124]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Groups as problem‐solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition , 1993 .

[125]  Paul S. Hempel,et al.  Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[126]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Transactive Memory: When Is It More Beneficial to Know What Others Know? , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[127]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time , 2007, MIS Q..

[128]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Template Use and the Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[129]  Scott Sonenshein,et al.  Routines and Creativity: From Dualism to Duality , 2016, Organ. Sci..